SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 245

D.A.DESAI, RANGANATH MISRA
Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent


Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, JAYAMALA GODBOLE, L.R.SINGH

ORDER

1. Mr E.C. Agarwala, learned counsel for the State of Jammu and Kashmir has placed on record a copy of the teleprinter message from the concerned authority dated August 30, 1984 informing him that Mr Bhim Singh the detenu, whose detention has been challenged in this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been released on August 24, 1984. This teleprinter message is followed by a letter confirming the same, Mr E.C. Agarwala, learned counsel has authenticated the letter as well as the teleprinter message, and placed them on record.

2. Mrs Jayamala, learned counsel for the petitioner and a member of the working committee of J & K Panthers Party has filed this writ petition for writ of habeas corpus questioning the validity of the detention of Mr Bhim Singh, who is a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir State. When the letter and teleprinter message were shown to Mrs Jayamala, she said that Mr Bhim Singh has not been released because she had contacted all the possible sources enquiring about the release of the petitioner, but he could not be contacted and therefore there is reason to believe that the statement made by Mr Agarwala is not co





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top