SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 192

A. P. SEN, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, D. A. DESAI, E. S. VENKATARAMIAH
K. C. Vasanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, B.R.AGRAWAL, B.VIRBHADRAPPA, GAUTAM PHILIP, H.S.RENUKA PRASAD, K.CHENNABASAPPA, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.M.NAYAR, K.N.BHATT, K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, L.G.HAVANUR, NANJAPPA GANAPATHY, NARAYAN NETTAR, P.H.PARIKH, P.K.MANOHARAN, P.S.NARASIMHA, R.K.GARG, S.S.JAVALI, VIJAY VERMA

Judgement Key Points

Question 1? How to identify which groups constitute "backward classes" under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) and what criteria may be used?

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) </ Key Points>

Question 1?

How to identify which groups constitute "backward classes" under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) and what criteria may be used?


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :- My learned Brethren have expressed their respective points of view on the policy of reservations which, alas. is even figuratively, a burning issue today. We were invited by the counsel not so much as to deliver judgments but to express our opinion on the issue of reservations, which may serve as a guideline to the Commission which the Government of Karnataka proposes to appoint, for examining the question of affording better employment and educational opportunities to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes. A somewhat unusual exercise is being undertaken by the Court in giving expression to its views without reference to specific facts. But, institutions profit by well-meaning innovations. The facts will appear before the Commission and it will evolve suitable tests in the matter of reservations. I cannot resist expressing the hope that the deep thinking and sincerity which has gone into the formulation of the opinions expressed by my learned Brethren will not go waste. The proposed Commission should give its close application to their weighty opinions. Mine is only a skeletal effort. I reserve the right to elaborate upon it, but
























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top