SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 199

M.P.THAKKAR, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
Shitla Prasad Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
PRAMOD SVARUP, R.B.MAHATO, S.N.KACKAR, V.M.TARKUNDE

JUDGMENT

THAKKAR, J. :— Seniority is the bone of contention.

2. The dispute centres round the question as to whether the High Court was right in affirming the view taken by the District Inspector of Schools that Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 were senior to the appellant in the lecturers grade in the Kashiraj Maha Vidyalaya. Inter College, Orai, District Varanasi.

3. The dispute regarding inter se seniority having arisen amongst the aforesaid three persons, the District Inspector of Schools examined the issue and rendered a decision*1A dated January 8, 1980 holding that Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 were senior to the appellant in the lecturers Grade having regard to the fact that their appointment in the grade became effective from 19-12-62, 1-7-63 and 23-7-1963 respectively.

* 1A. Under Regulation 3(1)(f) of Chapter II of the Regulations framed under the U. P. Intermediate Education Act.

4. The appellant challenged the decision by way of a Writ Petition to the High Court. The High Court affirmed the decision of the District Inspector of Schools and dismissed the Writ Petition. Thereupon the Writ Petitioner in the High Court has approached this Court by way of the present appeal by Special Leave



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top