SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 36

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Milagrinha Gonsalves – Appellant
Versus
Pedre A. Gonsalves – Respondent


ORDER

Special leave granted. Heard both the sides. On going through the judgment of the trial court and the judgment of the High Court and the relevant records, we are satisfied that the trial court was right and the High Court was wrong in recording the finding in regard to the question as to whe there the appellant was guilty of adultery. In our opinion the evidence on record does not justify the finding that appellant was guilty of adultery The High Court has failed to realize that in any case insofar as the two children, one, a seven year old daughter and another a five year old daughter were concerned, there was no ground at all for refusing maintenance to them The appeal is therefore allowed The order passed by the High Court is set aside, and the order passed by the trial court is restored. There will be no order regarding costs.

For Citation : 1987 (Supp) SCC 191.

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top