SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND V. KHALID, JJ.
The Union of India and others, Appellants
Versus
Smt. Charanjit Kaur, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2793 of 1985, D/- 20-1987.
Advocates appeared :
Mr. B. Datta, Addl. Solicitor General, Mr. C. V. Subba Rao and Mr. P. Parmeshwaran, with him, for Appellants; Mr. Hardev Singh, Sr. Advocate and Mr. R. S. Sodhi with him, for Respondent.
* C. W. P. 236 of 1985, D/- 13-5-1985, (Punj & Har).
-see decision in The Union of India v. Charanjit Kaur, AIR.1987 S. C. 1057=(1987) I SCC 471=(1987) I U.J. (SC) 341=(1987) I SCJ 259= 1987(1) JT 195 = 1987(1) Scale 86 = 1987 SCC (Crl.) 185.
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- The passport of Smt. Charanjit Kaur wife of Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan was impounded by the Regional Passport Officer, Delhi by an order dated August 18, 1984. The reasons for the order were not furnished to her "in view of the grave nature of her activities and serious implications in terms of sovereignty and integrity of India and the security of India" in terms of S. 10(5) of the Passports Act, 1967. The reasons are, however, to be found in the note made by the Regional Passport Officer on the same day. Paragraphs 1 to 3 of the note are as follows :
"Ref. Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi letter No. V.I/405/l/102/84 dated 18-8-1984 relating to the activities of Smt. Charanjit Kaur wife of Shri Jagjit Singh Chohan. Smt. Chohan is reported to have links with Sikh extremists and may engage in activities detrimental to the security of India. She is also planning to leave India shortly.
2. Reported activities detrimental to the security of India, attract the provision of S. 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.
3. Due to the seriousness of the case and the likelihood of the subject trying to leave the country, in public interest, it is not considered necessary to issue a separate show cause notice. The same may, however, be incorporated in the impounding order. The right of, the subject for appeal and the procedure in this regard may please also be explained in the impounding order, as per the Rules."
The basis of the communication from the Ministry of External Affairs to the Regional Passport Officer was the information furnished by the Intelligence Bureau in two letters to the following effect :
"According to a report Charanjit Kaur wife of Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan self-styled President of the so-called National Council of Khalistan who is now resident in U.K. is planning to leave India in the next few days. We are not aware of her passport particulars. There are reasons to believe that she has links with Sikh extremists and may engage in activities detriment to the security of the country and therefore she should not be allowed to leave India. It is requested that the MHA may consider the advisibility of impounding her passport." and,
"2. Our enquiries reveal that Smt. Charanjit Kaur is presently residing at Tanda and Nagai Khunga both in Hoshiarpur District.
3. Smt. Charanjit Kaur has not come to notice participating openly in political activities. She is however the wife of Dr. Jagjit Singh Chauhan President of the socalled National Council of Khalistan based in U.K. who has also been engaged in sustained anti-India and seccessionist activities. According to the disclosures made by .......... Smt. Charanjit Kaur and Balbir Singh Sandhu self-styled Secretary General of the National Council of Khalistan used to hold frequent meetings in camera with Bhindrawala and his P.A. and they served as an important channel between Bhindrawala and his foreign links.
4. Smt. Charanjit Kaur has also been personally pursuing the Court cases of her husband and one Ram Singh Tihara a Khalistan protagonist in the Punjab and Haryana High Court."
2. The order of the Regional Passport Officer which was later confirmed on appeal by-the Chief Passport Officer was quashed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana on. the ground that there was no material for the conclusion of the Regional Passport Officer that impounding of the passport was necessary in the interests of the security and integrity of India and the security of India. The High Court expressed the view that the "Bhindrawale factor" stood eliminated long before the making of the order since Bhindrawale died on 6-6-1984 whereas the order impounding the passport. was made on 18-8-84. According to the High Court it could not therefore be said that there was any danger in presenti from the activities of Smt. Charanjit Kaur. The High Court appeared to think that the order was made for the sole reason that Smt. Charanjit Kaur happened to be the wife of Dr. Jagjit Singh Cha
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.