SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.L. OZA, B.C. RAY AND K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, JJ.
Ranjeet Singh and another, Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 304 of 1987, D/- 25-1-1988.
Indian Penal Code – Section 302 – Offence of Murder - Appeal – Convcition – Death sentence - Entire family consisting of father, mother, son and five daughters were done to death when they were fast sleep in their residence in village Birkali – Prosecution story, to put briefly, was that the deceased victim Bhagtu Ram Kumbhhar was the real brother of the accused Shyolal – They were the original residents of village Cigorani district Sirsa in the State of Haryana – Nearly 15 or 20 years ago, both the brothers came to live in village Birkali and they purchased 50 Bighas of agricultural land for cultivation –Held, In the instant case, we have plenty of such corroborating evidence – Evidence of Hanuman (P.W. 15) is trustworthy. He is a Khati (Carpenter) – He was very much known to the accused – He saw- the accused along with the approver at the sunset time near the waterkund from where they proceeded towards the house of the deceased – He saw them taking their meals at that kund. Khyali Ram, saw a part of the incident – They saw the accused in the house of the decease – Evidence of Jaishingh, (P.W. 9) further established the presence of the accused along with the approver in the house of the deceased – There is no reason to discard the testimony of these three witnesses – Prosecution has been able to recover weapons of the crime from the accused – Recovery of the weapons has been made at the instance of the accused – It also lends reassurance by way of corroboration to the evidence of the approver – All these evidences, if taken together, give no scope to doubt the prosecution version – Appellants in our opinion have been rightly convicted for the murders in question – With regard to the sentence of death, there cannot be two opinions – Manner in which the entire family was eliminated indicates that the offence was deliberate and diabolical – It was predetermined and cold blooded – It was absolutely devilish and dastardly – Innocent children were done to death with lethal weapons when they were fast asleep – Sentence of death awarded cannot, therefore, be said to be inappropriate – Appeal dismissed
Judgment
JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the judgment dated July 31, 1986 of the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 208 of 1985 maintaining the conviction and accepting the reference on sentence of death awarded to the appellants under S. 302 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge in SC No. 115 of 1979.
2. In the night between 16-17th of July, 1979, the entire family consisting of father, mother, son and five daughters were done to death when they were fast sleep in their residence in village Birkali. The prosecution story, to put briefly, was that the deceased victim Bhagtu Ram Kumbhhar was the real brother of the accused Shyolal. They were the original residents of village Cigorani district Sirsa in the State of Haryana. Nearly 15 or 20 years ago, both the brothers came to live in village Birkali and they purchased 50 Bighas of agricultural land for cultivation. Both the brothers jointly lived in Birkali for two or three years and thereafter Shyolal returned back to his native village Cigorani. Before leaving village Birkali, he had mortgaged his share in the property in favour of some one for a sum of Rs. 1200/-. The deceased Bhagtu Ram redeemed that mortgage. Shyolal thereafter, demanded his share in that property. Bhagtu Ram agreed, provided Shyolal paid him the amount of Rs. 1200/- which he had paid to the mortgagee. That was not acceptable to Shyolal. Two or three months before the incident, the parties appeared to have approached the influential persons of the village to get the matters settled. Nanusingh (PW 10) the ex-Pardhan of the Panchayat Samiti, Nohar and the other persons of the village Birkali tried to settle the dispute between the two brothers. Evidently,they did not succeed. Shyolal was not willing to pay the amount of Rs. 1200/- to Bhagtu Ram. The accused Shyolal told Nanusingh and others that he would himself settle the dispute without anybodys intervention. It is said that thereafter Shyolal started harbouring an ill-will against his brother Bhagtu Ram.
3. On Sunday preceding the incident, Shyolal and other accused said that they would go next day to village Birkali and would take back the possession of the fields from Bhagtu Ram. On July 16, 1979, the appellants and two other persons including Banwari armed with different weapons went to the village Birkali. They entered the house of Bhagtu Ram in the dead of night and started killing the inmates one by one.One of the daughters of Bhagtu Ram raised some cries and tried to escape, but was instantaneously done to death. Hearing her cries, Khyali Ram, (PW-3) and Ram Kishan (PW-4) whose houses are situate not far away, came there and saw a part of the occurrence. They could not do anything since they were terribly frightened. So they quietly left the place. Jaisingh, PW-9, who was sleeping on the roof of the neighbouring house, got up on hearing the noise. He also got frightened and did not intervene. The accused after committing the eight murders left the village Birkali.
4. At about sun rising, Birkali (PW-5) while passing by the house of Bhagtu Ram, saw the dead bodies of Bhagtu Ram and members of his family. He rushed to the Sarpanch, Sahi Ram (PW-6) and told him what he had seen. Sahi Ram also came and saw the place. The police was informed by sending a message with the signature of Sahi Ram (Ex. P.22) sent through Saheb Ram (PW-7), the peon of the Gram Panchayat.
5. The prosecution in all examined 18 witnesses in the course of the trial and the accused, Banwari was granted pardon under S. 307 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He thus became an approver. The learned Sessions Judge found all the accused guilty of the offences they were charged with. Since one of them was held to be a child, as defined in the Rajasthan Children Act, 1970, his case was referred to the Children Court, Bikaner. The remaining two accused, who are the appellants before us, w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.