B.C.RAY, G.L.OZA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Shobhraj Jain – Respondent
Judgment
JUDGMENT:- The habeas corpus petition filed by the respondents was allowed by the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 13-2-1987 where it has been specifically stated that "It is not disputed that at the time the grounds were formulated, the detaining authority had before it documents only at Serial No. 6 was actually received and considered by the detaining authority on 24th February 1986". The documents were really received by the detaining authority on 24-2-1986 and it is on the basis of this that the learned Judge allowed the habeas corpus petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that this statement of fact contained in the judgment is not correct and it is contended that this has been stated in the special leave petition. But it is clear that the affidavit of the counsel who was present before the High Court of Bombay when this matter was heard, has not been filed. In such a situation, we cannot accept any statement excepting the statement made in the judgment about the facts.
3. The learned Judge on the basis of this admitted situation of facts came to the conclusion that on the date on which the grounds were finalised all the documents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.