SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 136

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C. RAY AND S.R. PANDIAN, JJ.
Abdul Razak Abdul Wahab Shaikh, Petitioner
Versus
S. N. Sinha, Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and another, Respondents.
Writ Petn. (Criminal) No. 307 of 1988
Decided on 3-3-1989.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Ram Jethmalani and Mr. U.R. Lalit, Sr. Advocates, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal and Mr. Arvind Nigam, Advocates with them, for Petitioners, Mr. T.U. Mehta, Sr.Advocate, Mr. Dushiant Dave, Mr. M. N. Shroff and Mrs. S. Dikshit, Advocates with him, for Respondent.

Advocates:
ARVIND NIGAM, DUSHYANT A.DAVE, KAMINI JAISWAL, M.N.SHROFF, RAM JETHMALANI, S.DIXIT, T.U.Mehta, U.R.Lalit

Headnote:Gujarat Prevention of Anti - Social Activities Act, 1985-Section 3(1)-Detention order under when detenu was in jail custody - Bail application rejected- No other bail application made before order of detention - Grounds of detention stating that at present you are in jail yet "there are full possibilities that you may be released on bail in this offence also"-Whether detention order is liable to be quashed? (Yes).

       Held: This statement clearly showed that the detaining authority was completely unaware of the fact that no application for bail was made on behalf of the detenu for his release before the Designated Court and as such the possibility of his coming out on bail is non existent. This fact of non-awareness of the detaining authority, in our opinion, clearly establishes that the subjective satisfaction was not arrived at by the detaining authority on consideration of relevant materials. (Para 23)

       Held therefore, mere bald statement that the detenu who is in jail custody is likely to be released on bail and there are full possibilities that he may continue the above offensives without reference to any particular case or acts does not show on the face of the order of detention that there has been subjective satisfaction by the detaining authority in making the order of detention in question. We, therefore, quash the order of detention and direct the respondents to set the detenu at liberty forthwith. (Paras 23 and 24) - Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985- Section 3(2)- Detention order dated May 23, 1988 under- Challenged-Detenu was in jail custody when the order was served on him- Application for bail filed by the detenu was rejected on 13th May, 1988- Thereafter no application for bail was made for release of detenu before the order of detention was served on him- Detaining authority completely unaware of the fact that possibility of his coming out on bait is non-existent- A mere bald statement that there are full possibilities that he may continue the offensive activities without reference to any particular case or acts- Held: there has been no subjective satisfaction by the detaining authority on the basis of which the impugned order has been clamped on the detenu.

       (Paras 11 & 12)

JUDGMENT

RAY, J. :— The petitioner who is the brother of detenu, Abdul Latit Abdul Wahab Sheikh of Ahmedabad has challenged in this petition the order of detention dated May 23. 1988 passed by the respondent No. 1, the .Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad City, Gujarat issued under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 and served on the detenu while the detenu was in custody at Sabarmati Central Prison under a judicial order of remand made by the Designated Court, Ahmedabad in respect of C. R. No. 40 of 1987, on the grounds inter alia that there has been absolute non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority in clamping the order of detention and also on other grounds.

2. In order to decide the various contentions raised in this writ petition, it is necessary to consider the background as well as the various orders of detention passed against the detenu by the detaining authority, the respondent No. 1. On September 11, 1984, the detenu was served with a show-cause notice under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 calling upon him to show cause as to why he should not be externed from the limits of Ahmedabad City Police Commissioners jurisdiction and its surrounding areas as also from the rural areas of Gandhinagar, Kheda and Mehsana District limits for the activities of February, 1983 (or 1985). In 1985 the detenu was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 and 324 of Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. 37 of 1985. On February 14, 1985 the detenu was granted bail in the said case by the Sessions Court, Ahmedabad. On March 18, 1985 communal riots broke out in Ahmedabad city and on March 24, 1985 an order of detention under the National Security Act was passed against the detenu by the respondent No. 1. During the communal riots one Police Sub- Inspector, Mr. Rana was killed in Kalupur P. S. F. 1. R. was lodged against the detenu and six other accused on May 9, 1985. In the FIR the detenu was named as accused No. 2. On July 6, 1985 charge-sheet was submitted in C.R. No. 37 of 1985. On September 27, 1985 enquiry was completed in externment proceedings and arguments were heard. On November 12, 1985, the detenu surrendered to police and he was arrested and taken into custody. In the said case accused Nos. 6 and 7 were discharged, the detenu along with accused No. 4 was tried in the said charge by the Principal Judge. Sessions Court who by his judgment dated May, 26, 1986 acquitted the detenu and the co-accused after recording of the evidence of witnesses and considering the same. The detenu was, however, enlarged on bail by the Magistrate in the said case vide his order dated June 23, 1986 as no case was made out against the detenu under Section 307, 1. P.C. and the offence, if any, was only under Section 324, I. P.C. The detenu was released from jail on June 23, 1986 and immediately as he came out, an order of detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) was served on the detenu there and then and he was once again taken into custody. It is relevant to mention in this connection that on January 18, 1986 the order of externment of the detenu from Ahmedabad City and rural areas of Gandhinagar etc. was made while he was in custody. The detenu preferred an appeal against the externment order which was heard by the Deputy Secretary (Home). The State Government confirmed the order of externment on June 23, 1986. On August 7, 1986, the State Government revoked the order of detention dated June 23, 1986 on the ground that no Advisory Board was constituted. On the same day, however, the State Government passed the second order of detention under PASA and the same was served on the detenu on the same day. The detenu filed a special Criminal Application No. 1862 of 1986 challenging the externment order dated January 18, 1986 and its confirmation order dated June 23, 1986 before the, High Court of Gujarat. The detenu also filed another Specia









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top