SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE K. J AGANN ATHA SHETTY AND YOGESHWAR DAYAL, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 855(N) of 1979
DIRECTOR GENERAL, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Versus
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
And
Civil Appeal No. 2665 of 1991
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Versus.
G.R DEVADU
Civil Appeal No. 855(N) of 1979 with Civil Appeal No. 2665 of 1991
Decided on 11-7-1991
Advocates appeared
M. Chandrasekharan, Additional Solicitor General (A Subba Rao and C.V. Subba Rao, Advocates, with him) for the Appellants;
R.K. Garg, Senior Advocate (R.P. Singh, Rakesh Khanna, P.C Kapur and Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocates, with him) for the Respondents.
Employment and Service matter - Lower and Upper Division Clerks – Seniority - Promotion - Persons in cadre of Lower Division Clerks belonging to GSI were promoted as Upper Division Clerks against vacancies that arose in GSI - They were apparently juniors to their counterparts in IBM - Being aggrieved by said promotions, association of officers who originally belonged to IBM preferred Special Civil Application of Bombay High Court for setting aside seniority list - Contended before High Court that merger of two departments took place with effect from January 1,1966 and not from February 4, 1969 and therefore there cannot be two separate channels of promotions from January 1, 1966 one for employees of Exploration Wing of IBM and another for employees of GSI - Government of India sought to justify promotions exclusively given to officers of GSI between the period from January 1,1966 to February 4,1969 on ground that actual merger took place not on January 1, 1966 but on February 4, 1969 - Held, This conclusion is based more on equitable consideration than on law. It is the result of failure to focus on the difference between the terms of letters dated January 1, 1966 and February 4/6, 1969. It may be emphasized that non-consideration of the contesting respondents for promotion in the IBM during the period/from 1966 to 1969 even assuming it to be true is however no ground for them to seek promotion in GSI. They must seek their promotion during the interregnum only in their parent department - It is submitted that if merger took place with effect from February 4, 1969 there was no necessity for GSI to prepare the provisional seniority list of officers of combined cadre as on December 1, 1968. Reference is also made to the "Introduction to te Compilation Vol. 100 Part I, Records of the GSI", in which it is mentioned that on January 1, 1966, Mining Divisions of the IBM have been merged with GSI - Said provisional seniority list and statement of introduction to the compilation, in our opinion, are no evidence of date of merger and indeed, they do not reflect the decision of the Government of India which we have earlier discussed - Set aside the impugned judgment and order – Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.—
In the field of mines and minerals, the Government of India has two departments: (/) Exploration Wing of the Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM) and (i/) Geological Survey of India (GSI). The GSI is responsible for geological mapping and exploratory drilling calculated to delineate mineralised zones in the country. The IBM conducts detailed probing operations in selected blocks of mineralised areas. The functions of these two departments were found to be overlapping. The Government of India, therefore, decided to merge the Exploratory Wing of IBM with the GSI to eliminate overlapping works and rationalise the functions of the two departments. To accomplish this purpose, different cadres of the Exploration Wing of IBM were merged with the GSI from different dates. There is no dispute that the posts concerned in these cases also came to be merged with the GSI. The question, however, for consideration is about the date of that merger, whether it was from January 1, 1966 or from any subsequent date. The Government of India contends that the merger took place on February 4/6, 1969 while the contesting respondents claim that it was with effect from January 1, 1966.
2. The dispute as to the date of merger has arisen because of the following circumstances. That between the period from January 1, 1966 to February 4, 1969, 39 persons in the cadre of Lower Division Clerks belonging to GSI were promoted as Upper Division Clerks against the vacancies that arose in the GSI. They were apparently juniors to their counterparts in the IBM. Being aggrieved by the said promotions, the association of the officers who originally belonged to the IBM preferred Special Civil Application No. 985 of 1969 at Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court for setting aside the seniority list and for a direction to consider their cases of promotion with effect from January 1,1966. It was contended before the High Court that the merger of the two departments took place with effect from January 1,1966 and not from February 4, 1969 and therefore, there cannot be two separate channels of promotions from January 1, 1966 one for the employees of the Exploration Wing of IBM and another for the employees of GSI. The Government of India sought to justify the promotions exclusively given to the officers of GSI between the period from January 1,1966 to February 4,1969 on the ground that the actual merger took place not on January 1, 1966 but on February 4, 1969. The High Court, however, did not accept the submission of the Government of India. The High Court summarised its conclusion thus :
"It is also to be noted that after January 1,1966 the petitioners did not get any promotion or were not considered for promotion by the Indian Bureau of Mines because they were treated under the administrative control of Geological Survey of India. If the contention of the respondents is accepted then it will have to be held that for three years the cases of the petitioners cannot be considered by the Geological Survey of India and they were not considered by the Indian Bureau of Mines because they were not under the administrative control of Indian Bureau of Mines. This will result into absurdity and, therefore, such a contention cannot be accepted. We are, therefore, inclined to hold on consideration of the annexures produced along with this petition that the merger in the two wings has taken place on January 1, 1966. Therefore, the seniority of Upper Division Clerks will have to be considered and made in this light after taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners merged and became the part of Geological Survey of India on January 1, 1966 and, therefore, for the purpose of counting their seniority, their past service rendered with the Indian Bureau of Mines will have to be treated as service rendered with the Geological Survey of India. This is the correct effect of the letter R-2 relied upon by the respondents. We, therefore, direct respondents 1,2 an
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.