SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 755

P.B.SAWANT, K.N.SINGH, G.N.RAY, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.RANGANATHAN, N.M.KASLIWAL, S.C.AGRAWAL
Mohanlal Daulat Ram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT:— This is an appeal from a decision of the Bombay High Court in a reference made to it u/ S. 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 in relation to the assessment year 1959-60 in respect of which the relevant previous year as the Samvat year 2014. A few facts may be stated just to clarify the real issue that has arisen in the case. Mohan Lal Daulat Ram and his son Sevanti Lal were partners under a deed dated 12-11-1953 under which the partners shared profits equally, but the goodwill was to belong solely to Mohan Lal. It is important here to mention that Mohan Lal Daulat Ram and Sevanti Lal were partners in the firm in their individual capacity. Their respective shares of income from the firm was assessed in their hands as their individual profits.

2. Mohan Lal Daulat Ramdied on l7-12-1955. Thereupon a fresh deed of partnership was drawn on 26-12-1955 which was to take effect from 18-12-1955. Under that deed the partners of the firm were Sevantilal and his mother Bai Chandanbai. It was, however, recited in the deed that Sevantilal "has taken Bai Chandanbai, widow of Mohan Lal Daulat Ram, as a partner (representing the family of the deceased Mr. Mohan Lal Daulat Ram)".

3. Th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top