SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 456

M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY
MANINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER SINGHS – Respondent


ORDER

1. Special leave granted.

2. This is an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated March 22, 1991 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14319 of 1991.

3. The appellant filed a complaint against the accused respondents and two others for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 368 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code before a Judicial Magistrate I Class, Hoshiarpur. In support of her complaint the appellant, besides herself, examined her father Kartar Singh and a neighbour Dasondhi Ram as witnesses. The learned Magistrate issued process against the accused-respondents for he was of the opinion that there was sufficient ground for proceeding. The two others afore-referred to could not be served and were proclaimed absconders. Statedly they came from the State of Uttar Pradesh and their whereabouts were not known. The accused respondents, however, were served. Instead of facing the enquiry at the pre-charge stage, they straightaway moved the High Court invoking its powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that the complaint filed against them was false, that the prosecutrix had made a statement befo



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top