SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 41

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, N.D.OJHA, S.RANGANATHAN
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Shivdatt And Sons – Respondent


JUDGMENT

These are three appeals by the State of Maharashtra. They arise out of the sales tax assessments of two assessees M/s. Shiv Datt and Sons and M/s. Vora Brothers. In the case of M/ s. Shiv Datt and Sons there are two assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70 involved, while in the case of M/ s. Vora Brothers, the assessment relates to the period from 1-11-66 to 31-10-67. All the three appeals involve the same issue and can be disposed of by a common order.

2. M/s. Shiv Datt and Sons are dealers for Exide Batteries while M/s. Vora Brothers are dealers for Standard Batteries. They purchase the batteries from the manufacturers and sell them. The question is whether they can be treated as having resold the same good that they have purchased making them eligible for relief under S. 8 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

3. The above question arises for consideration in the following circumstances :

The manufacturers sell to the assessees before us what are described as, "dry batteries without electrolyte". The batteries, when manufactured by the manufacturers, undergo a process known as "formation charge". In this process, the plates of the battery are immersed in a solution of sulphuric a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top