SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. RANGANATHAN, V. RAMASWAMI AND S.C. AGRAWAL, JJ.
Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bombay, Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Respondent
Civil Appeal No.1031 of 1979 with C.A. Nos.4543 of 4545 of 1990 and C.A. No.4539 (NT) of 1990, D/-18-2-1992.
WITH
State of Maharashtra, Appellant
Versus
M/s. Pulgaon Cotton Mills Ltd., Respondent
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Rules 41 and 41 A - Claimed by assessee - Convenient - Registered dealer who manufactures taxable goods for sale - In assessing amount of tax payable in respect of any period by a Registered dealer who manufactures taxable goods for sale (here in after in this rule referred to as the "Manufacturing dealer") Commissioner shall grant to him a draw-back, set-off or as the case may be a refund of the aggregate – Held, Relief may be based on the us principle that the manufactured product is taxed either in hands of the same asseses or in someone elses hands, or that the manufactured goods are exported which may yield no tax but earn foreign exchange or even that the purchases are utilised for manufacture of goods in the State thus contributing to industrial development of the State - It is therefore difficult to read into the provision a quantitative correlation of goods resulting in a taxable turnover and the purchases of raw materials on which tax has been paid - In this background straightforward answer to the question raised lies in the literal interpretation of the language of rules without straining to discover some doubtful principle for denying relief - Appeals dismissed.
JUDGMENT
RANGANATHAN, J.:- These are appeals by the Revenue arising out of proceedings under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter -called the Act). The respondents, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (in C.A. 1031 of 1979) and Phulgaon Cotton Mills Ltd. (in the four other appeals) are assessees to sales tax. They claimed a setoff, against the sales tax payable by them for the years in question, of certain sums, invoking the provisions of Rr. 41 and 41 A framed under the Act, as they stood at the relevant time. As the wording of these rules, in so far as it is material for our present purposes, is identical and the basis of the claim was also common, it will be convenient to dispose of both seta of appeals by a common judgment and we proceed to do so.
2. The set off claimed by the assessee was in terms of S. 42 and Rr. 41 and 41 A, which may now be referred to:
1.Section 42 reads thus:
"42. Draw-back, set off, refund etc.
The State Government may provide by rules that-
(a) in such circumstances and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the rules a draw-back, set off or refund of the whole or any part of the tax-
(i) xx xx xx
(ii) paid or levied or leviable in respect of any earlier sale or purchase of goods under this Act or any earlier law, be granted to the purchasing dealer;
(b) xx xx xx
The State Government has notified various rules from time to time in exercise of this power which are collected in Chapter VII of the Rules. Of these we are concerned with Rr. 41 and 41 A.
(2) Rule 41 (omitted w.e.f. 24-6-81) was a very long rule containing several clauses. In so far as is relevant for our present purposes, it was in the following terms:
"41. Drawback, set-off etc. of tax paid by a manufacturer - In assessing the amount of tax payable in respect of any period by a Registered dealer who manufactures taxable goods for sale (here in after in this rule referred to as the "Manufacturing dealer"), the Commissioner shall grant to him a draw-back, set-off or as the case may be a refund of the aggregate of the following sums, that is to say:-
(a) xx xx xx
(aa) xx xx xx
(b) xx xx xx
(bb) xx xx xx
(c) xx xx xx
(cc) xx xx xx
(d) xx xx xx
(e) a sum recovered from the manufacturing dealer by another registered dealer by way of sales tax or, general sales tax or as the case may be, on the purchase by him of goods from such registered dealer. being goods specified in schedule C to the Act other than in entries 1 to 11 (both inclusive) and 15 therein and in Schedule D other than in entries 1 to 4 (both inclusive) therein and in Schedule E other than in entries 1 and 2 therein, when the purchasing dealer did not hold a recognition or when the dealer held a recognition but effected the purchase otherwise than against a certificate under S. 12 of the Act provided that such goods are used by him in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale or in the packing of taxable goods manufactured by him for sale.
Explanation: xx xx
(Material portions underlined)
(3) The relevant portion of R. 41 A, which has been invoked in the case of Phulgaon Cotton Mills Ltd., reads thus:
"41 A. (1) Drawback, set-off etc. of tax paid by a manufacturer in respect of purchases made on or after the 15th July, 1962 : In assessing the amount of tax payable in respect of any period by a Registered dealer who manufactures taxable goods for sale or export* (hereinafter in this rule referred to as the "manufacturing dealer"), the Commissioner shall, in respect of the purchases made by such dealer on or after the 15th July, 1962 of any goods specified in Schedule B, C, D or E and used by him within the State in the manufacture of taxable goods** which have in fact been sold by him (and not given away as samples or otherwise) or which have been exported by him or used by him in the packing of goods so manufactured grant him a drawback, set-off or, as the case may be, a refund of the aggregate of the following sums, that is to say :
* The words "or export" were inserted by a not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.