SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 492

YOGESHWAR DAYAL, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Raj Bala – Appellant
Versus
Dy. Director Of Education – Respondent


JUDGMENT

By order dated October 13, 1987 this Court disposed of the present appeals in these terms:

"Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the facts of the cases, we consider it unnecessary to go into the legal aspect as we are inclined to agree with the counsel that all the teachers concerned should be given employment irrespective of the fact whether they are recruites of the year 1975 or 1976. We have also no intention to disturb the judgment of the High Court. We direct the State of U. P. to make appropriate adjustments and give employment to both the groups of teachers. Our direction shall be confined only to the parties to these proceedings. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. No costs."

2. Pursuant to this order, the Department tried to accommodate some teachers in the institution concerned and others in the institutions of the neighbouring districts. One of the teachers who was posted out, approached the Allahabad High Court and obtained stay of posting. The writ petition filed by that teacher has since been transferred to this Court and numbered as T.C. (Civil) No. 152 of 1988.

3. On November 21, 1988 this Court again made an order which reads as follows:

"We have hea















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top