SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 924

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
Sampat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
INDU GOSWAMI, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, KAPIL SIBAL, Mahabir Singh, R.K.GARG, S.SRINIVASA VARMA

ORDER

Pandian, J.—The above Special Leave Petition is preferred by the petitioners of whom petitioner Nos. 1 to 16 are members of the Legislative Assembly of Haryana and petitioner Nos. 17 to 19 are members of the Parliament. They all jointly filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 14500 of 1991 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh seeking various reliefs, the main of which being to direct an investigation by Central Bureau of Investigation against Ch. Bhajan Lal on the basis of FIR No. 372 of 1 987 of Sadar Police Station, registered on the complaint of Dharam Pal, making serious allegations of corruption, misuse of authority etc. and for setting aside the order of the Magistrate discharging the accused, Ch. Bhajan Lal.

2. The High Court dismissed the petition by a brief order without going into the locus standi of the petitioners. The relevant portion of the impugned order is as follows :

"3. The reasons disclosed in the writ petition and canvassed by the learned counsel for the petitioners broadly are, that respondent No. 2 being in the helm of affairs of State, there is a reasonable apprehension in the minds of the people t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top