SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 574

KULDIP SINGH, N.P.SINGH
Ram Swaroop: Hari Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Indu Malhotra, K.C.BAJAJ, Kusum Chaudhary, PREM MALHOTRA

JUDGMENT

N. P. SINGH, J.:—Two appeals have been filed against the same judgment. Criminal Appeal No.406 of 1990 has been filed on behalf of Ram Swarup. Pala Ram and Mela Ram; whereas Criminal Appeal No.407 has been filed on behalf of Hari Ram, Brijlal and Prem. All the six accused persons had been put on trial for causing the death of Biru Ram and injuries on Ranjit Ram (PW 4), Dharampal (PW 5), Ajmer Singh (PW 10), Joginder Singh (PW 11), Smt. Phoola Devi and others. The appellant Prem, is alleged to have given gandasi blows on the head of Biru Ram, which proved fatal. So far the other five appellants are concerned, there is no allegation that they caused any injury on the person of Biru Ram (deceased).

2. It is an admitted position that Biru Ram (deceased) and the appellant Mela Ram were brothers. The prosecution witnesses Ranjit Ram, Dharampal, Ajmer Singh and Joginder Singh are the sons of Biru Ram (deceased). Smt. Phoola Devi is the widow of Biru Ram (deceased). Ram Avtar, who was also injured in the occurrence, is the son of Ranjit Ram and as such grandson of Biru Ram (deceased). On the side of the accused persons, Prem Chand, Brijlal and Hari Ram are the sons of Mela Ram. Onl













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top