G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Rizwan – Appellant
Versus
Waqar Ahmad – Respondent
ORDER
1. The Police filed a charge-sheet under Section 307 IPC against the respondents/accused. The Magistrate, however, having regard to the nature of the injuries instead of committing the case converted it into a warrant-case and proceeded to try the respondents-accused under Sections 323 and 324 IPC. Questioning the same, a revision was filed before the Sessions Judge who directed the Magistrate to commit the case to the Court of Session holding that the Magistrate had no option except to commit. As against that a revision was filed by the accused before the High Court. The High Court allowed the revision and confirmed the order of the Magistrate. But it appears that certificate granting leave to appeal was granted by the High Court taking the view that a question of law namely regarding the scope of Section 209 CrPC was involved.
2. Having gone through the judgments of both the courts below we are unable to persuade ourselves to hold that the High Court has committed any error in allowing the revision. Section 209 of the CrPC lays down that if it appears to the Magistrate that the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session then it has to commit. No doubt in the insta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.