SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 501

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, P.B.SAWANT
Mohan Rawale – Appellant
Versus
Damodar Tatyaba Alias Dadasaheb – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Appellant seeks special leave to appeal to this Court from the order dated February 24/26, 1992 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Chamber Summons No. 1179 of 1991 in Election Petition No. 4 of 1991.

2. Before the High Court, the first respondent, who was defeated at the election held on June 15, 1991, to the 10th Lok Sabha from the South Central Parliamentary Constituency, called in question the election of the returned candidate - the appellant. Corrupt practices under Sections 123(2), 123(3) and 123(3-A) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (Act) are alleged. In the proceedings, appellant took out Chamber Summons for an order of dismissal of the election petition on the ground, inter alia, that the memorandum of election petition did not disclose a cause of action; that copies were not supplied; that the pleadings were frivolous and vexatious and required to be struck out. The High Court has dismissed this motion.

3. We have heard Shri G.L. Sanghi for the appellant and Shri R.F. Nariman for the respondents. We grant special leave. The appeal is heard and is disposed of by this order. A number of grounds appear to have been taken before the High Court in s








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top