Judgment

Agarwal, J.-This Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution raises the question whether it is permissible to withdraw the cone ent given by the State Government under section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) whereby a member of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (D.S.P.E.) was enabled to exercise powers and jurisdiction for the investigation of the specified offences in any area in the State and, if so, what is the effect of such with-drawal of consent on matters pending investigation on the basis of such consent on the date of withdrawal.

2. The Act was enacted to make provision for the constitution of a special police force in Delhi for the investigation of certain offences in the Union Territories, for the superintendancc and administration of the said force and for the extension to other areas of the powers and jurisdiction of members of the said force in regard to the investigation of the said offences. D.S.P.E. constituted under the said Act is now known as the General Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Sections 5 & 6 of the Act read as under

"Section 5-

(1) The Central Government may by order extend to any area (including Railway areas) in a State, not being a Union territory the pawers and jurisdiction of members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment for the investigation of any offences or classes of offences specified in a notification under section 3.

(2) When by an order under sub-section (1) the powers and jurisdiction of members of the said police establishment are extended to any such area, a member thereof may, subject to any orders which the Central Government may make in this behalf, discharge the functions of a police officer in that area and shall, while so discharging such functions, be deemed to be a member of the police force of that area and be vested with the powers, functions and privileges and be subject to the liabilities of a police officer belonging to that police force.

(3) Where any such order under sub-section (11 is made in relation to an area, then, without prejudice to the provisions of subsection (2), any member of thj Delhi Special Police Establishment of or above the rank of Sub-Inspector may, subject to any orders which the Central Government may make in this behalf, exercise the powers of the officer in charge of a police station in that area and when so exercising such powers shall be deemed to be an officer in charge of a police station discharging the functions of such an officer within the limits of his station."

"Section 6-

Nothing contained in section 5 shall be deemed to enable any member of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to exercise powers and jurisdiction in any area in a State, not being a Union territory or railway area, without the consent of the Government of that State"

2. By his letter dated October 20, 1976, addressed to the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, the Chief Secretary to the Government of Sikkim conveyed the consent of the Government of Sikkim under section 6 of the Act to the members to the D S.P.E in exercising powers and jurisdiction on the whole of the State of Sikkim for the investigation of the offences punishable under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code specified therein as well as offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1 47. Similar consent in respect of offences under other enactments was conveyed by letter of the Chief Secretary, Government of Sikkim, dated July 10, 1979 and the orders of the Government of Sikkim dated December 24,1983. June 28, 1984 and December 10, 984.

3. Respondent No. 4 was the Chief Minister of Sikkim during the period 1979 to 1984. He ceased to be the Chief Minister on May 11, 1984. On May 26, 1984, a case [RC. 3/84. CIU(A)] was registered by the C.B.I, for offences punishable under section 5(2) read with section 5(l)(e)ofthe Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The