SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 384

S.C.AGRAWAL, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Kazi Lhendup Dorji – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


Judgment

Agarwal, J.-This Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution raises the question whether it is permissible to withdraw the cone ent given by the State Government under section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) whereby a member of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (D.S.P.E.) was enabled to exercise powers and jurisdiction for the investigation of the specified offences in any area in the State and, if so, what is the effect of such with-drawal of consent on matters pending investigation on the basis of such consent on the date of withdrawal.

2. The Act was enacted to make provision for the constitution of a special police force in Delhi for the investigation of certain offences in the Union Territories, for the superintendancc and administration of the said force and for the extension to other areas of the powers and jurisdiction of members of the said force in regard to the investigation of the said offences. D.S.P.E. constituted under the said Act is now known as the General Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Sections 5 & 6 of the Act read as under

"Section 5-

(1) The Central Government may by order extend



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top