A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
Bimla Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :— This petition arises out of a complaint having been made by one Smt. Bimla Devi complaining that Shri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad granted bail to the accused-respondent No. 4 involved in a case under Section 302/ 34 of the Pencl Code for murder of her son in G. R. No. 1619/92, corresponding to Jorapakher P. S. Case No. 168/92, despite the fact that the two earlier bail applications of the said accused were successively rejected by the High Court, Ranchi Bench. This Court had issued a notice to the respondents including the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Dhanbad, Bihar requiring them to show cause why the bail granted to the accused be not cancelled. The respondent No. 3, Shri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate has sent his reply to the show-cause stating that the accused-respondent No. 4 was granted only provisional bail which has been cancelled by him by his order dated 8-6-1993 and that the accused has already been taken into custody.
2. In view of the fact that the Judicial Magistrate at a later stage has himself cancelled the bail, it is not necessary for us to pass any order with regard to the petitioners prayer for cancellation of bail but the disturbing fea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.