SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G.N. RAY, JJ.)
BRIJPAL SINGH AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Criminal Appeal No. 176 of 1984{From the Judgment and Order dated December 22, 1983 of the Allahabad High Court in Govt. Appeal No. 2659 of 1976}, decided on March 30, 1993
Advocates appeared
R.K. Garg, Senior Advocate (D.K. Garg, Advocate, with him) for the Appellants;
A.S. Pundir, Advocate, for the Respondents.
Indian Penal Code, Section 302 - 324/149 and 148 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 379 and 145 - Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Section 2 – Offence of murder – Rioting armed with deadly weapons – Charge sheet - It is alleged that in year, father , PW 1 was murdered and relations of accused were charged for that murder and were convicted - In one were joint owners of land and sold her share to and objected to mutation but mutation was allowed - Having got annoyed mortgaged his half share in favour with a view to harass - It is further alleged that damaged crop of Sikdar as a result of which proceedings were initiated and land purchased by Sikdar was attached - Accused persons armed with country-made pistols fired and other members of his family and caused injuries , his brother, PW 2 and and his son - This occurrence was also witnessed by PW 4 - When witnesses remonstrated, seven assailants ran away towards sout - PW 1 arranged to take injured to police station but he was informed that accused persons were lying in ambush on way, upon which Sikdar decided to proceed to Police Station instead – Held, in a case of this nature where witnesses are interested, by way of rule of caution we think it would be safe to convict only such of those accused to whom specific overt acts have been attributed - As spoken to by all these witnesses, definite case that emerges is that on day of occurrence some minor altercation took place at about 4 p.m. when Holi festival offerings were going to be made - According to these witnesses (since dead) and, A-4 armed with lathis, A-5 armed with a gun and rest armed with country-made pistols came there - No doubt any form of instigation also would make him liable constructively - Since Court are dealing with interested witnesses, it would be safe to convict only such of those accused who participated in occurrence and caused injuries - When witnesses are highly interested and when circumstances also go to show that several people gathered at place of occurrence watching Holi festival, perhaps it becomes all the more necessary to scrutinise evidence of these interested witnesses with great care and caution - In this view of matter Court think it is a fit case, A-4 should be given benefit of doubt but by this Court are not in any manner doubting veracity of three eyewitnesses - Accordingly convictions and sentences awarded against, A-4 are set aside and he is acquitted of all charges - If he is on bail, his bail bonds shall be cancelled - Convictions and sentences awarded against remaining accused are confirmed - In result appeal is allowed so far , A-4 is concerned and dismissed
Judgment
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.- This is a regular appeal under Section 379 CrPC read with Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970. There are six appellants. They along with one Kalyan Singh who died during the trial, were tried for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur and were acquitted. The State preferred an appeal against the remaining six accused. The High Court allowed the appeal. However, two of them A-5 Prem Pal Singh and A-6 Shyam Pal Singh who were children, were not awarded any sentence and the remaining four accused were sentenced to imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under Sections 324/149 and 148 and sentenced to two years and one year R.I. respectively. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. All of them have preferred this appeal. The prosecution case is as follows.
2. All the accused are related to each other and are Thakurs by caste while the deceased Sripal and the injured witnesses are Kachuwahas and all of them belong to the same village Deshpur. The village is predominantly inhabited by Thakurs and there was animosity between the accused and the deceased. It is alleged that in the year 1933 Narpat, the father of Sikdar, PW 1 was murdered and the relations of the accused Kalyan Singh were charged for that murder and were convicted. In 1967 one Premwati and Muthu were joint owners of land and Premwati sold her share to Sikdar and Muthu objected to the mutation but mutation was allowed. Muthu having got annoyed mortgaged his half share in favour of Kalyan Singh with a view to harass Sikdar. It is further alleged that Kalyan Singh damaged the crop of Sikdar as a result of which proceedings under Section 145 CrPC were initiated and the land purchased by Sikdar was attached. On March 8, 1974 at about 10 a.m. Sikdar was passing near the attached land when he saw Prem Pal Singh, A-5 and Brij Pal Singh, A-1 damaging the pea crops. Sikdar made a complaint to Jai Singh, Superdar, PW 3 and went to the spot along with him. Superdar PW 3 reprimanded Prem Pal Singh and Brij Pal Singh which they did not like. The present occurrence took place at about 4 p.m. on March 8, 1974. Sikdar was sitting on the chabutra of Ram Singh in front of Chaupal along with Sheda and Rameshwar. Gokaran and Ram Lal, brothers of Sikdar and Sheoraj son of Sripal were also standing in front of their houses. It was Holi festival and offerings were to be made to the Holi fire as per the custom. Vijay Singh, a close relative of Kalyan Singh asked Sikdar to come and make offerings in the Holika i.e. Holi fire but Sikdar declined. Shortly thereafter Kalyan Singh and Deep Singh, A-4 armed with lathis, Prem Singh, A-5 armed with a gun, Brij Pal Singh, A-1, Ram Pal, A-2 and Shiv Mangal Singh, A-3 armed with country-made pistols came from the south. It is alleged that Kalyan Singh and Deep Singh accused pointed to Sikdar and his family members and said that they should be killed. Thereupon Prem Pal Singh, A-5 fired his gun which hit Sripal son of Gokaran who fell down. The accused persons armed with country-made pistols fired at Sikdar and other members of his family and caused injuries to Sikdar, his brother Ram Lal, PW 2 and Gokaran and his son Sheoraj. This occurrence was also witnessed by Rameshwar PW 4, Sheda, Mulaiam and Raghunath. When the witnesses remonstrated, the seven assailants ran away towards south. Sikdar, PW 1 arranged to take the injured to the police station but he was informed that the accused persons were lying in ambush on the way to Mirzapur, upon which Sikdar decided to proceed to Police Station Jalalabad instead of going to Mirzapur. Sripal however died due to the injuries on the way before reaching the police station. Sikdar, however, gave an FIR on March 9, 1974 at about 6.30 a.m. and the papers were transferred to Police Station Mirzapur as the case related to the jurisdic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.