SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 303

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE DR A.S. ANAND AND FAIZAN UDDIN, JJ.)
Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 1989{From the Judgment and Order dated 31-10-1988 of the Bombay High Court in Crl. A. No. 2 of 1988}
RAMPAL PITHWA RAHIDAS AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
With
Criminal Appeal No. 466 of 1989{From the Judgment and Order dated 27, 28 and 31-10-1988 of the Bombay High Court in Crl. A. No. 2 of 1988}
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Versus
BASAWAN AND OTHERS
Criminal Appeal Nos. 201 and 466 of 1989, decided on March 1, 1994
Advocates appeared
A.K. Sanghi, Advocate, for the Appellant in Crl. A. No. 201 of 1989. S.M. Jadhav and A.S. Bhasme, Advocates, for State of Maharashtra. Shiv Pujan Singh, Rajeev Kumar and Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocates, for the Respondents 1-3.

Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, A.S.BHASME, RAJIV SHARMA, S.M.JADHAV, SHIV PUJAN SINGH, SUNIL SINGH

Headnote:Code of Cr. Procedure, 1973, Sec. 156-investigating agency-duty of-investigation agency creating false evidence and fabricating false clues in the testimony of approver who was planted and failed to apprehend the real criminals-In every civilized society the police force is invested with the powers of investigation of crime to secure punishment for criminal-it is in the interest of the society that the investigating agency must act honestly and fairly and not resort to fabricating false evidence or creating false clues only with a view to secure conviction-let no guilty man go unpunished but let the end not justify the means-the courts must remain ever alive to this truism.

       (Paras 32, 35 & 36)

       Evidence Act, 1872, Sec. 9-test identification of the appellants and the approver nit held to have them identified by injured witnesses-culprits alleged to be wearing masks at the time of assault-identification in court by witnesses is hardly of any significance.

       (Para 27)

       Evidence Act, 1872, Sec. 133, 114(b)-approver’s evidence when reliable-as a matter of practice and prudence courts have held that the testimony of an approver may be accepted in evidence provided it receives corroboration from direct or circumstantial evidence in material particulars-the courts have generally looked upon with suspicious the Statement of an approver and insist upon independent corroboration of his testimony-the entire story regarding approver’s arrest appears to be a police concoction-the version of the incident given by the accused (approver) about the manner in which he was arrested is quite different from the version given by other Pws-the statement made by the approver in his bail application and his petition seeking pardon and to be made approver are irreconcible-High Court was not right in not considering the variation in two statements-after making so called voluntary statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. in 1984 why did he complain in his application dated 17, 1, 87 that he was being forced to become eye witness though he did not know any thing about the crime-the approver on his own showing did not identity any of the appellants except one the statement of approver at the trial recorded more than three years after the occurrence is so detailed that it is difficult to believe its clear that the approver was planted witness and not worthy of reliance and credence-the prosecution has not been able to prove the case against any of the appellants beyond a reasonable dout and their conviction can not be sustained (1973) 3 SCC 805 ref.

       (Paras 9, 14, 19, 21, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 33 & 34)

Judgment

DR A.S. ANAND, J.- These two appeals, by special leave, arise out of a common judgment of the High Court of Judicature, Appellate Side, at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dated 27th, 28th and 31st October, 1988, confirming the death sentence passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for an offence under Section 302 IPC on five appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 1989. Three convicts were acquitted by the High Court and Criminal Appeal No. 466 of 1989 has been filed by the State of Maharashtra against their acquittal. This judgment will dispose of both the appeals.

2. Nine accused persons, namely, Rampal, Fulchand, Babulal, Sheoprasad alias Dhunda Chunbaliya, Basawan, Shamlal, Pratap, Ramkishore and Ramcharan, were sent up for trial for committing the murder of Tanba Gedam, Baldeosingh, Raman Chandra, Prakash Vehadkar and Raju Deshmukh and for causing injuries to Surendra PW 31, Mahendrasingh PW 33 and Doma PW 5 on July 3, 1984 between 7.30 p.m. and 10 p.m. on the Highway Chandrapur-Ballarshah Road while committing dacoity. (One other accused who had also been arrayed by the police died before the trial in police custody). They were tried for offences under Sections 302, 307, 342 read with Section 149 and Sections 395 and 396 of IPC. Accused 1 Ramcharan Rahidas turned an approver and was examined as such. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge accepting the testimony of the approver and the other prosecution evidence, convicted all the eight accused mentioned above and awarded the sentence of death to all the eight accused for the offence under Sections 302/149 IPC, and for the offences under Sections 307 and 395, the accused were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs 50 each and in default they were directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven days. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge submitted the proceedings to the High Court for confirmation of the sentence of death and the convicted eight accused also filed a criminal appeal challenging their conviction and sentence in the High Court. While the appeal of appellants Basawan Rahidas, Pratap Rahidas and Ramkishore Rahidas was accepted and they were acquitted of all the charges, the appeal filed by Rampal and four others was dismissed and their conviction under Section 302 IPC was maintained. The High Court also confirmed the sentence of death on Rampal and the other four appellants, who have filed Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 1989. The State of Maharashtra has filed Criminal Appeal No. 466 of 1989 against the acquittal of Basawan and two others.

3. The prosecution case is that on July 3, 1984, near K.M. No. 9 on Chandrapur-Ballarshah Road which is a part of Highway No. 84, construction of two buildings of a seed centre was in progress. Doma and Tanba were acting as watchmen at the construction site. At about 7.30 p.m., while Tanba and Doma were present at the site, they heard the approaching movement of some persons. One of those persons on reaching near Doma and Tanba picked up a bamboo stick. Four other persons surrounded Doma while two others started assaulting Tanba with bricks, as a result whereof Tanba fell down. The miscreants assaulted Doma and Tanba with bricks, stones and rafters and tied them by removing the dhoti which Tanba was wearing and dragged them both to a distance of about 25 ft. and ultimately threw them in a ditch, which was at some distance away from the main road. The assailants on hearing the sound of a two-wheeler approaching, went up to the main road and assaulted the rider of the two-wheeler Raman Chandra. After giving beating to him, he was dragged and thrown near the road. Mahendrasingh and Baldeosingh were coming on a scooter from the Ballarshah side and they were also assaulted by the assailants with rafters and sticks. A bag containing Rs 7040 and some documents was snatched from them. As a result of the beating, Mahendrasingh and Baldeosingh became unconscious. Baldeosingh died on the spot. The assa










































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top