SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 149

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Indramani Bai – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad – Respondent


ORDER

1. Assessees are the appellants. They are aggrieved by the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court answering the question referred to it under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, at the instance of the Revenue, against them. The two questions referred read as follows :

"(1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the profits of Rs 41,666 derived by the assessee was an adventure in the nature of trade;

(2) If the answer to the above question is in affirmative, whether the assessment could be made in the status of an association of persons."

2. The assessees are the wives of two brothers, who are partners in a firm. In December 1963, the assessees purchased a piece of land measuring 8479 sq. yards in the Banjara Hills area of Hyderabad, for a consideration of Rs 10,620. They say, they raised the purchase-money by selling their silver to the partnership firm, of which their respective husbands are partners. The firm deals in bullion. Shortly after purchasing the land, they carved it into four plots and sold them individually. Two agreements of sale were entered into, one in May and the other in July 1964 and sale deeds executed in pursuance thereof on October 9, 1964



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top