SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE A.M. AHMADI AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.)
M. JANARDHAN AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF A.P. AND OTHERS.
Civil Appeal No. 979 of 1981{From the Judgment and Order dated 11-6-1979 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in Representation Petition No. 507 of 1977}, decided on November 26, 1993
Advocates appeared
H.S. Gururaj Rao. Senior Advocate (T.V. Ratnam, Advocate, with him) for the Appellants; K. Madhava Reddy, Senior Advocate (G. Prabhakar, T.V.S.N. Chari, Ram Kumar, Ms Janaki Ramachandran. Advocates, with him) for the Respondents.
S. Markandeya, Ajay Singh and Ms C. Markandeya, Advocates, for the Intervener. Y.P. Rao. Advocate, for impleading party Respondents 122-125.
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 309 - Cadre - Promotee Health Inspectors - Regularisation of services - Cadre - Respondent 2, Director of Medical & Health Services, appointed appellants and a few others in Andhra Pradesh Public Health Subordinate Service (APPHSS) on a temporary basis since all of them had successfully completed Sanitary Inspectors Course in Osmania Medical College - Similarly, during years Respondent 2 appointed Respondents 4 to 121 who were Health Assistants, Health Sub-Inspectors, Vaccinators etc. in feeder cadre, as Health Inspectors in cadre of APPHSS by promoting them temporarily, even though they were not qualified for appointment by promotion as Health Inspectors, in that they had not put in requisite service in feeder cadre - Appellants and Respondents 4 to 121 who were already in cadre of APPHSS on temporary basis applied to PSC for being selected and appointed on a permanent basis as Public Health Inspectors in said cadre - Indeed, all of them were selected by PSC and a selection list was prepared by it giving selectees rankings on basis of their comparative merit - Held, As seen from Rule 37(e) of Rules to which we have advened to earlier, it has enabled regularisation of temporary promotee Health Inspectors in cadre of APPHSS from anterior date - However, Court are not shown any material which would show such regularisation of temporary promotee Respondents 4 to 121 had been made after their subsequent promotion in accordance with Rules, a precondition envisaged under Rule 37(e) of Rules - PSCs deletion of their names from selection list cannot amount to their promotion in accordance with Rules - If a person, having been appointed temporarily under sub-rule (a) or sub-rule (c) of Rule 10 to a post borne on cadre of any service, class or category or having been appointed to any service, class or category otherwise than in accordance with rules governing appointment thereto is subsequently appointed to any service, class or category in accordance with rules, he shall commence his probation from date of such subsequent appointment or from such earlier date as appointing authority may determine - Orders of retrospective regularisation of temporary promotees and temporary direct appointees, as Health Inspectors in cadres of APPHSS are made, Court uphold those orders and subsequent order made by State Government in G.O.Ms. No. 105, Health dated as to fixation of inter se seniority among them and dispose of this appeal accordingly.
Judgment
VENKATACHALA, J.- This appeal is directed against the order dated June 11, 1979 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, by which Representation Petition No. 507 of 1977 in which retrospective regularisation of the services of promotee Health Inspectors in the cadre of Health Inspectors in Andhra Pradesh Public Health Subordinate Service had been questioned by direct recruit Health Inspectors in that very cadre, is dismissed.
2. The factual context which furnishes the background in which this appeal needs consideration and decision, warrants mention at the outset.
3. During the years 1958 to 1962 Respondent 2, the Director of Medical & Health Services, Andhra Pradesh appointed the appellants and a few others in the Andhra Pradesh Public Health Subordinate Service (APPHSS) on a temporary basis since all of them had successfully completed Sanitary Inspectors Course in Osmania Medical College. Similarly, during the years 1961 to 1969 Respondent 2 appointed Respondents 4 to 121 who were Health Assistants, Health Sub-Inspectors, Vaccinators etc. in the feeder cadre, as Health Inspectors in the cadre of APPHSS by promoting them temporarily, even though they were not qualified for appointment by promotion as Health Inspectors, in that, they had not put in the requisite service in the feeder cadre. When, in the year 1968, the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (PSC) invited applications from qualified candidates for selection and their appointment as Health Inspectors in the cadre of APPHSS on a permanent basis, the appellants and Respondents 4 to 121 who were already in the cadre of APPHSS on temporary basis, applied to PSC for being selected and appointed on a permanent basis as Public Health Inspectors in the said cadre. Indeed, all of them were selected by PSC and a selection list was prepared by it giving the selectees rankings on the basis of their comparative merit. The delay in appointing the selectees according to the selection list, appears to have made some of the selectees to approach the Andhra Pradesh High Court, for relief. The High Court by its order dated September 20, 1971 in Writ Petition No. 3981 of 1970. has indeed, directed the Government to take steps to appoint the selectees in the selection list of PSC, as Health Inspectors on a permanent basis in the cadre of APPHSS.
4. However, Respondents 4 to 121, who were given rankings below the appellants in the selection list of PSC, but were not to be appointed accordingly, moved the State Government for their regularisation as Health Inspectors in the cadre of APPHSS from the respective dates of their eligibility for promotion to that cadre on temporary basis, by getting their names deleted from the selection list of PSC. so as to make them become seniors to appellants in the cadre.
5. By then, Special Rules for Andhra Pradesh Public Health Subordinate Service, issued under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India on December 31, 1964, which were given retrospective effect, required of persons in the categories of Health Assistants, Health Sub-Inspectors, Vaccinators etc. of not less than three years of service in those posts for being promoted as Health Inspectors. Respondent 2, who wished to concede to the representation of promotee Health Inspectors, appears to have written to PSC, requesting it to delete the names of Respondents 4 to 121 who had been temporarily promoted as Healh Inspectors, from its selection list of Health Inspectors, so as to enable him to give retrospective promotion to them according to the dates on which they had become eligible for promotion as Health Inspectors. On deletion by the PSC of the names of Respondents 4 to 121, accordingly, Respondent 2 issued proceedings dated April 1, 1977 ordering commencement of the probation of promotee Health Inspectors with effect from the dates from which they became eligible for promotion as Health Inspectors, obviously in exercise of his powers under Rule 37(e) of the Ru
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.