SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 904

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN
Union Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Chandrakant Gordhandas Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
D.A.DAVE, P.K.Dev, RAJIV TYAGI, RANI JETHMALANI, SOLI J.SORABJI, U.A.RAMA

JUDGMENT

M. K. MUKHERJEE, J.:- The only question which falls for determination in this appeal is whether the respondent is a deemed tenant of the landlord under S. 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Act for short) which confers such status upon a person, who was on February 1, 1973 in occupation of any premises or any part thereof, which is not less than a room, as a licensee. Both the trial Court and the appellate Court answered the question in the negative recording con current findings that there was an unauthorised sub-letting in favour of the respondent and decreed the suit filed by the appellant-landlord for his eviction, whereas the High Court, in its writ jurisdiction reversed those findings and dismissed the suit.

2. The appellant filed the suit in 1966 for eviction of M/s. H. D. Commercial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation), who was its monthly tenant in respect of one room in its building in Bombay on the grounds of default in payment of rent and unlawful sub-letting of a partitioned portion of the room, (marked as BCDE in the plan which was exhibited during trial as Ext. B and hereinafter referred to as the prem













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top