SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 168

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, J.S.VERMA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Warlu – Appellant
Versus
Gangotribai – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT - The appellant, Warlu, made an application before Addl. Tahsildar, Hinganghat. District Wardha in State of Maharashtra for a declaration that he was a tenant of Survey Nos. 7, 8 & 9 of village Anatargaon. That application was registered as Revenue Case No. 12. Appellant, Warlu, claimed to be a tenant by virtue of a lease granted in his favour by Subhadra and Ahilya, daughters of Mahadeorao through his second wife Parvatibai. On the other hand, Gangotribai, the first wife of Mahadeorao filed an application registered as Revenue Case No. I before the AddI. Tahsildar for a declaration that Warlu and Kesho were not tenants, the right which they claimed in Revenue Case No. 12. In addition to these two revenue cases, there were two other cases registered as Revenue Cases Nos. 2 & 4 which arose out of references made by the Civil Court for deciding the claim of Laxman, Tulshiram and Bani who claimed to be tenants of the same lands through Gangotribai. These applications were heard and decided by a common order made by the Addl. Tahsildar who accepted Warlus claim of being the tenant of these lands. Against the common order, made by the AddI. Tahsildar, appeals were file








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top