ORDER

I. A. Nos. 1 & 2 of 1991

Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 and 2 are dismissed.

Writ Petition (Civil) No.,831 of 1991

We have heard Mr. P. P. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner at considerable length. In our view there is no scope for any relief to be granted on this writ petition.

2. This application under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the gradation list corrected as on 1-4-199l. of the Judicial officers of Haryana, claiming that the 6 subordinate Judges, mentioned in paragraph 20 of the writ petition, who were actually appointed later than the petitioner must be shown junior to him. It is claimed by the petitioner that since he was appointed against one of the 34 posts of the judicial officers of the 1980-81 batch he must be entitled to get his seniority reckoned by reference to the earlier year, and the aforementioned 6 respondents who were given the benefit of their seniority with reference to 1984 must be held to his junior.

3. In a judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court dated February 27, 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 1688 of 1981, it was directed that the appellant should be appointed with effect from March 15, 1985 an