SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1022

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
State Of Mizoram – Appellant
Versus
Biakchhawna – Respondent


Advocates:
H.VAHI, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.LEHRI, R.SATISH

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act) was published in the Gazette by the State of Mizoram on 13-8-1987 acquiring the land in District Aizawl for providing accommodation to the Assam Rifles. The respondent filed objections and ultimately the objections were overruled. The Collector made his Award No. 4 of 1988 on 26-8-1988. The respondent was entitled to compensation of Rs 5,34,748. The respondent received the compensation under protest and on 29-9-1988, filed an application but ultimately the Collector did not make any reference to the Civil Court under Section 18 of the Act.

3. The respondent filed the Civil Suit No. 2 of 1989 in the Court of Deputy Commissioner, Aizawl which endorsed for disposal to the Additional District Magistrate. After the receipt of the notice the appellant objected to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in entertaining the suit. The Additional District Magistrate in his judgment overruled the objection and granted the decree declaring that "the respondent is entitled to a sum of Rs 26,39,286 as compensation for compulsory acquisition of his lands described in the suit and shall ge












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top