SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 952

A.S.ANAND, G.T.NANAVATI
Deepti Alias Arati Rai – Appellant
Versus
Akhil Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, PRAMOD SVARUP

JUDGMENT

NANAVATI, J.- Leave granted.

2. The appellant made a complaint to the Officer-in-charge of Women Police Station, Bilaspur alleging demand of dowry, harassment and cruelty by Respondents 1, 2 and 3 being the husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively. The police after making investigation, filed a charge-sheet against the said respondents in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bilaspur, indicating commission of an offence under Section 498-A IPC. The learned Magistrate after supplying copies of the charge-sheet and other documents and hearing the learned Advocate for the accused framed a charge under Section 498-A. The order framing the charge was challenged by the accused by filing Criminal Revision No. 260 of 1993 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur. The learned Additional Judge was of the view that there was sufficient material to frame a charge against all the accused and therefore, dismissed the revision application. Thereafter the accused approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr PC with a prayer to quash the said charge and the proceedings instituted upon the basis of the aforesaid charge-sheet. The High Court referred to i




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top