SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 168

A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
State Of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
THIRUKKURAL PERUMAL – Respondent


Advocates:
K.V.VENKATARAMAN, V.G.PRAGASAM

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of an order made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 9-11-1993 in Criminal Original Petition No. 8730 of 1992, Crl MP No. 4794 of 1992 and Crl MP No. 6765 of 1992. The learned Judge quashed the First Information Report, Crime No. 246 of 1992 of P.S. Tallakulam, insofar as the respondent is concerned as also the criminal proceedings emanating there from against him.

3. We have gone through the order of the learned Single Judge and heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. M.S.K. Shanmugovol Chettiyar lodged a first information report at P.S. Tallakulam against the respondents alleging commission of offences under Sections 147/148/342/323/395/506(ii) and 109 IPC. Investigation was taken in hand and some evidence was collected by the investigating agency. The respondent filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC in the High Court and by the impugned order the petition was allowed and the proceedings emanating from Crime Case No. 246 of 1992 {supra) were quashed. From a bare perusal of the order of the learned Single Judge it appears that while quashing the proceedings, reliance has been placed upon some evid


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top