SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R. M. SAHAI AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 2288 of 1986
Decided on 4-12-1994.
M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd.
Versus
Collector of Customs Appeals), Customs House, Madras.
Advocates appeared
Ms. Indu Malhotra, Advocate, for Appellant; Mr. Joseph Valla Palli, Sr. Advocate and Mr. S. I). Sharma. Advocate with him, for Respondent.
Constitution Of India - Article 129 - Article 142 - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 2(b) - Section 2(c) - Section 20 - Transfer of Property Act - Section 54 - Licence Agreement - Bid And Interest - Did Not Pay In Terms Of Agreement - Skipper entered into a licence agreement, paid 50 of original bid and secured payment of balance 50 of bid and interest at rate of 18 per annum thereon by submitting bank guarantees for Rs. 9.82 crores, in terms of which a sum of approximately 1.944 crores was required to be paid as each instalment - A total of 5 instalments was payable every six months, first being due - Against first instalment of Rs. 1.944 crores falling due, DDA recovered about Rs. 88.76 lacs by encashment of bank guarantee - Thereafter first respondent did not pay in terms of agreement – First respondent filed writ petition in High Court - Held, It is necessary to bear in mind that second respondent is wife of first respondent - She does not seem to have played any active role in all these transactions and events - As an Indian wife, dutiful and obedient, she seems to have only followed dictates and desires of her husband, in process she has done no more than lending her name both as a Director to Skipper as well as to various acts done by him in name of company - It will be unrealistic to ignore this I fact against our social background - Court must therefore take a pragmatic view of matter and distingushed her case from that of her husband as far as punishment to be imposed on them is concerned - Such a distinction will in no way minimise gravity of contempt that she has committed - AH properties and bank accounts standing in names of contemners and Directors of M/s. Skipper Construction Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and their wives, sons and unmarried daughters will stand attached – Appeal Disposed Of.
VENKATACHALA, J.:- This appeal under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 is directed against the order No. 234/1986-B.2 rendered on 10th April, 1986 by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi - "the CEGAT", in CD (SB)(T) Appeal No. 1933 of 1983 (B-2).
2. Whether there was justification for the CEGAT to classify the article "Granite Press Roll" under Import Tariff Item No. 68.01/16(1) of the 1stSchedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as it stood prior to its amendment on 28-2-1986, as against its classification made by the Collector (Appeals) under Import Tariff Item No. 84.31 thereof, is the question which needs our consideration and decision in this appeal.
3. The appellant, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, has two paper manufacturing units in India. As Granite Press Roll, which was required by the appellant to be used as a part of the machine, in one of its paper manufacturing units, was not indigenously made, the same was imported from United Kingdom by the appellant for such use. The Granite Press Roll, so imported, is goods or article which could be described thus :
Roll of 138" length and 22" diameter with raised spigots, fitted by mild steel shafts which are secured in position by means of mild steel end-plates hand-fitted to the spigots with mild steel nuts, the 3/8" cavity between the steel shaft and the granite shell, having been filled with concrete and the granite shell being of 7.18/8" thickness and the mild steel shaft 7" thickness. Thus, it is a part of machine made of parts of articles like Granite, Steel and Concrete.
4. Whatever be the description of the goods or article, the Granite Press Roll, it is found by the CEGAT to be "a component part of paper finishing machinery", its function being to give final finish or polish to paper.
5. However, by its order under appeal, the CEGAT has classified the said article. Granite Press Roll under Import Tariff Item No. 68.01/16(1) as against its classification made by the Collector (Appeals) under Import Tariff Item No. 84.31.
6. Was the said change of classification of the article - Granite Press Roll made by the CEGAT, uncalled for, as was argued on behalf of the appellant by Ms. Indu Malhotra, is the question which, now requires our consideration.
7. As a proper consideration of the said question becomes possible by reference to the relevant provisions in the 1st Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, it would be advantageous to excerpt them at the out-set:-
"SECTION XIII
ARTICLES OF STONE, OF PLASTER, OF CEMENT, OF ASBESTOS, OF MICA AND OF SIMILAR MATERIALS; CERAMIC PRODUCTS, GLASS AND GLASSWARE.
CHAPTER 68
ARTICLES OF STONE, OF PLASTER, OF CEMENT, OF ASBESTOS, OF MICA AND OF SIMILAR MATERIALS.
NOTE
This Chapter does not cover:
(a) to (n)....................
_________________________________________________________________
Heading
Sub-heading No. and description of article
Rate of duty (a) Standard (b) Preferential areas
Central Excise Tariff Item.
_________________________________________________________________
68.01/16
Articles of natural or artificial stones, of agglomerated natural or artificial abrasives, of plastering material, of cement, of concrete, of asbestos, of asbestos-cement or cellulose fibre cement, or of mica; articles of vegetable materials agglomerated with mineral binders, mineral wools, expanded mineral materials; articles of other mineral substances, not elsewhere specified or included :
22F.
23C.
51.
(1) Not elsewhere specified
(a) 100%
(2) Grinding stones, grinding wheels and the like of natural stone, of agglomerated natural or artificial abrasives, and segments or other finished parts of such stones and wheels but excluding hand polishing Stones, whetstones, oil stones, and hones."
(a) 40%
_________________________________________________________________
"SECTION XVI
MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL APPLIANCES; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; PARTS THEREOF
NOTES
1. This Section does not cover:
(a) to (o).......
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.