SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 629

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Raghubar Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.B.MISHRA, S.N.Singh

JUDGMENT :- Substitution allowed.

2. These three appeals are disposed of by a common judgment since they arise from the common judgment delivered by the High Court of Allahabad in W. P. No.3763/79 and batch dated July 4,1979. The facts in C. A. No. 3012/ 79 are sufficient for disposal of the appeals. On July 11,1956, the Government had granted to the appellant certain parcels of land for settling down colonies thereon and to cultivate the land on improved methods of cultivation, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the grant made under the Government Grants Act, 1985. Under S.10(2), of the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (for short the Act), notice was issued on October 20, 1974 by the prescribed authority calling upon him to submit the return for determination of the ceiling area. The appellants objections raised on December 4, 1975 were rejected by the Prescribed Authority by proceedings dated February 28, 1975 holding that the appellant held 94 Bighas 16 Biswas of surplus and was called upon to surrender the same. The appellant carried the matter in appeal to the appellate authority and the Civil Judge by Judgment dated June 2, 1976 dismissed th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top