SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. M. PUNCHH1 AND K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, JJ.
Sukhdev Singh and another, Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab and others, Respondents.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 551 of 1983 and 447 of 1984
Decided on 4-4-1995.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 323 - Section 34 - Section 307 - Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27 – Murder Offence - Right Of Self-Defence - (P.W.1) along with his wife (P.W.2), and deceased and their relation (PW3) were proceeding from house of Joginder Singh to house of their brother to discuss date for marriage - (P.W.3) was mediator - When all of them reached mango tree, A-1, and his brother, A-3 and their family friends, A-2 and A-4 emerged from Haveli - Raghubir Singh was armed with a .12 bore single barrel gun, his brother, A-3 was armed with a kirpan, A-2 and A-4, were armed with one dang each - On coming near to Lunge of P.W. 3, A-3 challenged and exhorted his co-accused that deceased, must be taught a lesson for informing electricity department - Thereupon accused A-2, gave a blow with his dang on head of Joginder Singh, A-4, also gave a blow on forehead of Joginder Singh with his dang - A-1, retracted from about two karams distance and fired a shot from his gun at Joginder Singh which hit on his chest and face - One of pellets from same shot caused injury to (P.W.2) - Deceased on receipt of gun shot fell down and died on spot - P.Ws. along with accused left place of occurrence - (P.W. 1) went to police station leaving behind (P.W.2) near dead body and gave a report - The Sub-Inspector, (P.W .7) registered crime and went to place of occurrence – Held, Court find that both Courts below have wrongly brushed aside specific plea put forward by accused - It is pertinent to note that Raghubir Singh, as a matter of fact has also given a complaint in respect of attack made on him as well as on his uncle, D.W. 2 - That being case, plea of accused that in right of self defence he caused injuries to Joginder Singh has a reasonable basis - In these circumstances plea of A-1, that his uncle, received serious injuries in attack made by deceased and other P.Ws. is probabilised particularly in light of the medical evidence given by P.W.8 - In such a situation if A-1 has shot at such assailants in order to exercise of right of self-defence he is perfectly within his limits when he has fired only shot which unfortunately resulted in death of Joginder Singh and a simple injury to P.W. 2 - Therefore, it cannot be said that he had exceeded right of self-defence, even if court apply all limitations relevant for an enquiry in a matter of exercise of right of self-defence - Court find hardly any material which suggests that accused have exceeded their right of self-defence - For all these reasons court is constrained to give benefit of exception to appellants - Accordingly convictions and sentences awarded against them are set aside – Appeal Allowed.
JUDGMENT
Four accused persons, Raghubir Singh alias Bhira s/o Chanan Singh, Sukhdav Singh alias Billa s/o Chanan Singh, Sukhdev Singh s/o Chanan Singh, Kulwant Singh s/o Chanad Singh originally accused Nos. 1 to 4 respectively were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The trial Court found them guilty and sentenced them accordingly. The appeal filed by them has been dismissed by the High Court. A-2 and A-4 filed Criminal Appeals Nos. 551/83 and A-1 and A-3 filed Criminal Appeal No. 447/84 in this Court. The prosecution case is as follows:
The accused as well as the deceased. Joginder Singh and the injured persons Harbhajan Singh (P.W.I), his wife Narinder Kaur (P.W.2), and Bachan Singh (P.W.4) belong to the village Bundala. On 24-9-81, Surinder Pal a Line Superintendent of Punjab State Electricity Board detected accused Raghubir Singh stealing electricity power from the main line for working his tubewell. He made a report. Raghubir Singh suspected that Harbhajan Singh (P.W. 1) and his brother Joginder Singh, the deceased were informants against him. On 26-9-1981 at about 2.30 p.m., Harbhajan Singh (P.W.1) along with his wife Narinder Kaur (P.W.2), and the deceased and their relation Bachan Singh were proceeding from the house of Joginder Singh to the house of their brother Gurbux Singh to discuss the date for marriage of Amarjit Singh. Bachan Singh (P.W.3) was the mediator. When all of them reached the mango tree, Raghubir Singh A-1, and his brother, Sukhdev Singh, A-3 and their family friends, namely, Sukhdev Singh alias Billa, A-2 and Kulwant Singh, A-4 emerged from Haveli. Raghubir Singh was armed with a .12 bore single barrel gun, his brother, Sukhdev Singh. A-3 was armed with a kirpan, Sukhdev Singh alias Billa, A-2 and Kulwant Singh, A-4, were armed with one dang each. On coming near to the Lunge of P.W. 3, Bachan Singh, Sukhdev Singh, A-3 challenged and exhorted his co-accused that the deceased, must be taught a lesson for inYorming the electricity department. Thereupon the accused Sukhdev Singh alias Billa, A-2, gave a blow with his dang on the head of Joginder Singh, Kulwant Singh, A-4, also gave a blow on the forehead of Joginder Singh with his dang. Raghubir Singh, A-1, retracted from about two karams distance and fired a shot from his gun at Joginder Singh which hit on his chest and face. One of the pellets from the same shot caused injury to Narender Kaur (P.W.2). The deceased on receipt of the gun shot fell down and died on the spot. P.Ws. along with the accused left the place of occurrence. Harbhajan Singh (P.W. 1) went to the police station Sadar. leaving behind Narinder Kaur (P.W.2) near the dead body and gave a report. The Sub-Inspector, Kulchhinder Singh (P.W .7) registered the crime and went to the place of occurrence. He held inquest on the dead body, sent the same for post-mortem and also sent the injured persons to the hospital for medical aid. The accused were arrested and gun of Raghubir Singh, A-1 was taken into possession and other weapons were recovered. Dr. Rajinder Singh (P.W.8) examined Harbhajan Singh (RW. 1) on 26-9-1981 at about 9 p.m., and her found lacerated wound on the scalp and swelling on the left side of the forehead. The same doctor also examined Narinder Kaur (P.W.2) and found a lacerated punctured wound with irregular inverted margins. He conducted the post-mortem on the dead body of Joginder Singh and found 9 injuries and some of them were described as gun shot injuries including injury wounds. On internal examination the doctor found that this was resulted at 16 different places and he also recovered some pellets from the liver and the doctor opined that the death was due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of injury No. 3. He further opined that injury No. 3 was individually and all of them collectively were sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. He also opined that all the injur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.