SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(BEFORE P.B. SAWANT, S. MOHAN AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ.)
GOVIND BAPU SALVI AND OTHERS
Versus
VISHWANATH JANARDHAN JOSHI AND OTHERS
Civil Appeal No. 2106 of 1980
Decided on 22-9-1993
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33-C(2) - Factories Act,1948 - Sub-section (1) of Section 59 - Section 59(2) - Employees - Overtime Wages - House Rent Allowance - Appellants are employees of respondent-Mint and are also in occupation of official quarters - They filed a claim before labour court for calculating their overtime wages on basis of their basic wages plus house rent allowance to which, according to them, they were entitled - Their contention was that even if they were occupying official accommodation, since under rules they were entitled to house rent allowance when no official accommodation was given to them, overtime wages payable to them should be calculated taking into consideration house rent allowance as well – Held, Appellants are not entitled to payment of house rent allowance since they are occupying official quarters - Hence for calculating overtime wages, house rent allowance cannot be taken into account - Service conditions envisage employees who are and who are not provided with official accommodation and provide for house rent allowance only to those who are not provided with accommodation - Service rules provide for house rent allowance when no accommodation is given, will not entitle employees to succeed in their present claim - Labour court had obviously erred in holding otherwise – Court is, therefore, in agreement with view taken by High Court - However, if appellants are entitled to calculation of overtime wages by including house rent allowance they are free to pursue that claim – Appeal Dismissed.
ORDER
1. The appellants are employees of the respondent-Mint and are also in occupation of the official quarters. They filed a claim under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the labour court for calculating their overtime wages on the basis of their basic wages plus the house rent allowance to which, according to them, they were entitled. Their contention was that even if they were occupying the official accommodation, since under the rules they were entitled to house rent allowance when no official accommodation was given to them, under Section 59(2) of the Factories Act the overtime wages payable to them should be calculated taking into consideration the house rent allowance as well. The labour court accepted their contention and granted the appellants claim. However, in writ petition filed by the respondents, the High Court held that since the appellants were occupying the official accommodation, they were not entitled to the payment of the house rent allowance within the meaning of Section 59(2) of the Factories Act. Hence the said allowance could not to be taken into consideration for calculating the overtime wage. In this view of the matter, the High Court set aside the order of the labour court and allowed the writ petition. It is this order which is challenged before us.
2. Section 59(2) of the Factories Act reads as follows :
"59. Extra wages for overtime.- (1)....
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1) ordinary rate of wages means the basic wages plus such allowances, including the cash equivalent of the advantage accruing through the concessional sale to workers of food grains and other articles, as the worker is for the time being entitled to, but does not include a bonus and wages for overtime work."
The language of this section is very clear. It says that the ordinary rate of wages which is referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 59 means basic wages plus such allowance ... as the worker is for the time being entitled to, but excludes bonus and wages for overtime work.
3. Admittedly, the appellants are not entitled to the payment of the house rent allowance since they are occupying the official quarters. Hence for calculating the overtime wages, the house rent allowance cannot be taken into account. What Section 59(2) contemplates is the eligibility to the payment of the house rent allowance. The service conditions envisage employees who are and who are not provided with the official accommodation and provide for house rent allowance only to those who are not provided with the accommodation. The mere fact, therefore, that the service rules provide for house rent allowance when no accommodation is given, will not entitle the employees to succeed in their present claim. The labour court had obviously erred in holding otherwise. We are, therefore, in agreement with the view taken by the High Court.
4. In this view of the matter, we dismiss the appeal with no order as to costs. However, if the appellants are entitled to the calculation of the overtime wages by including house rent allowance otherwise than under Section 59(2) of the Factories Act, they are free to pursue that claim.
For Citation: 1995 Supp(1) SCC 148
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.