ORDER

1. The writ petition filed is as vague as it can be and is liable to be dismissed on that short ground. It states that it is filed for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of about 700 safai workers working with the 1st respondent-Municipal Corporation of Meerut. The petition does not give the names of the workers nor the details of their services although the prayer is for regularisation of their services on the ground that they have been working for several years on daily wages. The petition has, however, been pending since 1986 and this Court has issued rule nisi. The matter has further been adjourned for hearing from time to time. Hence, we do not think it proper to dismiss the petition on the ground of vagueness.

2. In the affidavit in rejoinder filed as late as on 20-8-1993 and pursuant to the direction of the Court, a list of names of the alleged workmen and the dates from which they have allegedly been working has been furnished. Even this list shows that only 66 workmen have been working since 1979, whereas 18 workmen have been working since 1980 and 35 workmen have been working from 1981. Thus the workmen working from 1979-80 and 1980-81 together are not more tha