K.RAMASWAMY, N.P.SINGH
Benilal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER
1. The appellants tenancy was permitted to be terminated under clauses 13(2) and 13(3)00 of the Central Province and Berar Letting of House and Rent Control Order, 1949, for short the Order for ejectment from the demised premises on the ground that he was a habitual defaulter. A decree for eviction ensued which had become final by dismissal of the SLP in limine by this Court. Objections raised in the execution at the instance of his sons were overruled. Thereafter, the appellant filed the W.P. No. 1370 of 1984 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the constitutional validity of sub-clause (ii) of clause 13(3), which was dismissed in limine on June 18, 1984. Thus this appeal by special leave.
2. Section 2 of C.P. & Berar Regulation of Letting of Accommodation Act, 1946 reads thus:
"The Provincial Government may, by general or special order which shall extend to such areas as the Provincial Government may, by notification, direct, provide for regulating the letting and sub-letting of any accommodation or class of accommodation whether residential or non-residential, whether furnished or unfurnished, and whether with or without board, and in particular-
(a) for controlling the ren
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.