SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 152

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE K. RAMASWAMY AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.
STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS
Versus
ADWAIT CHARAN MOHANTY AND OTHERS.
Civil Appeal No. 1497 of 1993 with No. 1498 of 1993 and SLP No. 3175 of 1994 {From the Judgment and Order dated 6-5-1992 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in O.A. No. 998 of 1990} etc.
Decided on 27-1-1995
Advocates appeared:
D.P. Gupta, Solicitor General (A.K. Panda, Advocate, with him) for the Appellants; Vineet Maheshwari, R.K. Maheshwari, Vikas Singh, Yunus Malik, L.R. Singh, Janaranjan Das, B. Parthasarathi, D.P. Mohanty, S.K. Patri, Krishan Pal Singh, B.B. Sahoo, N.S. Bisht, Ms Kirti Mishra, K.K. Gupta and Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocates, for the Respondent.

Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, B.B.SAHU, B.PARTHASARTHY, D.P.GUPTA, D.P.MOHANTY, JANARANJAN DAS, K.K.GUPTA, K.P.SINGH, KIRTI MISHRA, L.R.SINGH, N.S.BISHT, R.K.MAHESHWARI, S.K.Patri, SUSHIL JAIN, VIKASH SINGH, VINIT MAHESHVARI, YUNUS MALIK

Headnote:

Constitution Of India - Article 309 - Article 14 - Employee Service - Workmen Retirement - All respondents have been working in various departments of appellant - On attaining age of superannuation of 58 years, when they were sought to be retired, they approached Administrative Tribunal, Orissa, which in impugned orders has held that they were workmen and entitled to continue in service until they attained age of 60 years as provided for under second proviso to Rule 71 (a) of Orissa Service Code - Case of Adwait Charan Mohanty, respondent could be referred to as exemplary case - While working as a Draftsman in office of Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Cuttack, he attained age of 58 years - When he was to retire he challenged notice of retirement – Held, Court is of considered view that government employee in Class III service shall retire on completion of 58 years of age - Even an artisan-workman who was promoted or appointed to Class III service be it gazetted or non-gazetted shall retire on completion of 58 years of age - An artisan-workman who is working in an industrial or work-charged establishment but he is on a par with Class IV employee is to retire on attaining age of 60 years under second proviso to Rule 71 (a) of Code - One essential condition to be satisfied is that such an artisan-workman, be it highly skilled, skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled, must, of necessity, be on monthly pay of Government – Court direct appellant not to recover any pay and allowances paid to them till they are made to retire pursuant to orders passed by Court - Before parting with case, court would like to point out that a cursory look into Code would show existence of yawning gaps and ad hoc amendments are made from time to time - It is high time to have fresh look and revamp Code in light of developments of service jurisprudence - In some of cases, namely, CA Nos. 676-679 of 1994 and SLP No. 2260 of 1994, appeals had been filed against interim orders and this Court has suspended all orders - In light of law laid down, Tribunal is directed to consider and dispose of all these cases according to law – Appeal Allowed.

JUDGMENT

K. RAMASWAMY, J.- Leave granted in SLP Nos. 4424, 13245-47, 18110- 18113 and 20136 of 1993, 4064, 2363, SLP No. 3172 of 1994 (OCC 24681), 2260, 4223, 2588, 4882, SLP No. 3173 (CC 25141), 9901, 2428, 11084-11095, SLP No. 3175 (OCC 26551), 18784 and 19083 of 1994.

2. These appeals raise a common question of law whether each of the respondents was liable to be superannuated only on attaining the age of 60 years. All the respondents have been working in various departments of the appellant-State as Draftsman, Senior Draftsman, Architectural Assistant Draftsman, Architectural Draftsman, Planning Assistant, Carpenter, Heavy Vehicle Driver, Mechanic, Foreman, Motor Grade Operator, Ferro Printer, Welder, Concrete Mixture Driver, Junior Machineman, Pump Mechanic, Pump Driver-cum-Mechanic, etc. etc. On attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years, when they were sought to be retired, they approached the Administrative Tribunal, Orissa, which in the impugned orders has held that they were workmen and entitled to continue in service until they attained the age of 60 years as provided for under the second proviso to Rule 71 (a) of the Orissa Service Code (for short "the Code"). It is not necessary to deal in detail with the facts of each case for they are not different from each other. However, facts of the case of Adwait Charan Mohanty, respondent in CA No. 1497 of 1993 could be referred to as exemplary case. While working as a Draftsman in the office of the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Cuttack, he attained the age of 58 years on 12-7-1990. When he was to retire on 31-7-1990 he challenged the notice of retirement, Annexure-A therein, contending that he is a workman within the meaning of the Code. The Tribunal held him to be a workman and that, therefore, he was entitled to continue in service till he completed the age of 60 years on 31-7-1994 with all the benefits of salary and allowances etc.

3. The question is whether the respondents are entitled to continue until they attained the superannuation age of 60 years? The Orissa Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962 (for short the Rules), defines government servant in Rule 3(f) to mean a person who is a member of a service or who holds a civil post under the State and includes any such person on foreign service or whose services are temporarily placed at the disposal of the Union Government or any other State Government or a local or other authority and also any person in the service of the Union Government or any other State Government or a local or other authority whose services are temporarily placed at the disposal of the State Government. Under Rule 8 the posts under the State other than those ordinarily held by persons to whom the Rules do not apply, are by general or special order of the Government classified as (i) State Civil Posts, Class I, (II) State Civil Posts, Class II, (iii) State Civil Posts, Class III, (iv) State Civil Posts, Class IV. Schedule B of the Rules enumerates all classes of posts. Class III service and posts have been enumerated in which all the afore stated posts have been specified. Class IV posts have also been specified and in none of the Class IV posts, the posts held by the respondents find place. Rule 29 of the Code defines ministerial servant to mean a government servant of a subordinate service whose duties are entirely clerical, and any other class of servant specially defined as such by general or special order of the State Government. The note appended thereto defines that Inspectors and Sub-Inspectors of Police employed purely on clerical duties and Sub-Registrar are not "ministerial servants".

4. Rule 52-A reads as follows:

"52-A. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the State Government in any statutory rules the minimum age-limit for entry into government service shall be as follows:

(i) not below twenty-one years in the case of gazetted government servants in Class I, Class II or Class III servi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top