SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1175

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Bharatbhushan Sonaji Kshirsagar – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Khalik Mohd. Musa – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The High Courts order under appeal is extraordinary. By passing interim orders it has allowed the writ petition, bypassing Section 55-A of the Maharashtra Municipal Act, 1965. Thereunder, the State Government is empowered to remove the President of a Municipality for grounds mentioned therein. The mere fact that there were complaints against the appellant was no ground for the High Court to achieve his virtual removal, for which Section 55-A was meant. That field was open to the State Government alone to act upon. At best a direction could be issued to the State Government to expedite proceedings on the complaint of the respondents. Rather, Mr Soli J. Sorabjee, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioner states that a direction to that effect may even be made by this Court so that the writ petition before the High Court stands disposed of on issuing such direction.

3. Adopting that course we allow the appeal and direct the State Government to take steps under Section 55-A of the aforesaid Act within a reasonable time. And by this direction we treat the writ petition before the High Court as if disposed of. Ordered accordingly.

4. No costs.

For Citatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top