SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 179

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rustam – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh, on 19-1-1994, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3492 of 1993, passed an order of compulsive bail holding the accused-respondents entitled to it by virtue of the provisions of Sections 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the basis that 90 days from the date of the authorised detention of the respondents had expired and the challan had not been filed within that duration, entitling them to bail. It would be relevant to mention that the respondents are accused of offences punishable with death or life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC etc. Unfortunately, the factual details of the crime have not been made available to us. All the same, it is pertinent to note that the accused-respondents on 3-9-1993 were sent by the Magistrate concerned to judicial custody which custody, under orders, was extended from time to time. On 2-12-1993, the challan was submitted in the court where after the accused-respondents applied for compulsive bail, as according to them, the period of 90 days expired on 1-12-1993 and on the premise that their right to compulsive bail survived even after the challan was filed. The High Court agreeing w




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top