ORDER

1. The brief facts are that Respondent 1, who was appointed as Staff Nurse in the appellants Institute in a temporary capacity on a substantive post, was warned more than once that her work was unsatisfactory and she should show improvement. Thereafter, on 15-1-1973, the Principal of the Institute served notice on her stating that her services will stand terminated w.e.f. the expiry of one month from the date of notice. However, on a representation made by her she was excused and the said order was withdrawn with a warning that if her work is not found to be satisfactory, her services will be terminated without any further notice. Again in April 1973 the Principal issued a letter informing her that her work was not found to be satisfactory and directed her to show improvement. In order to enable her to show improvement, her services were extended for a period of three months by an order dated 29-5-1973. On 10-7-1973 an order was issued stating that her services would not be required beyond 11-8-1973. It was in this manner that her services came to be terminated as she tailed to show improvement despite repeated opportunities given to her. She challenged the impugned order term