SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 494

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
Rev. Fr. M. S. Poulose – Appellant
Versus
Varghese – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.Yohaman, HARISH N.SLAVE, MALINI PODVAL, P.S.POTI, Ranji P.Thomas, Sudarsh Menon

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard the counsel on both the sides. One Ithara and his wife Annam had 7 acres and odd land. During their lifetime, Sosa, daughter of Mathew and her husband Varghese, the respondents herein, were looking after the old people. They executed a deed dated 5-3-1966, Ex. A-2. Thereunder they have given in consideration of the affection and the faithful service rendered by them, 70 cents of land absolutely to Sosa. For the rest of the lands, it was recited thus :

"We reserve our right during our lifetime to live according to our wishes in the building described along with you and if need be we have full rights and liberty to appropriate the entire income and profits from the properties except those set apart in the name of the second named amongst you. In the event during our lifetime it becomes necessary to mortgage or alienate the schedule property the same should be effected by you jointly with us and with the consent of all of us."

3. We are not concerned with rest of the terms of the document. During the lifetime of the old people, they cancelled this document under Ex. A-3, dated 11-3-1968. The respondents challenged the same. In the trial court they



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top