SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 925

KULDIP SINGH, N.M.KASLIWAL
Hawa Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Ayesha Khatri, Indu Malhotra, PREM MALHOTRA

JUDGMENT

Kuldip Singh, J. - The appellants were tried for the murder of Jang Singh-and Ram Sarup by the Designated Court, Bhiwani at Hissar. Hawa Singh was convicted under Sections 148,302,307 and 323/149, Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.). He was further convicted under Section 27 Arms Act read with Section 6(1) of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. 1985. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and other sentences on different counts. Uday Singh was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and was sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- with usual default clause. He was also convicted under Sections 307/149 and 323/149 I.P.C. Rai Singh was convicted under Sections 302/149, 307/149, and 323/149 I.P.C. and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Ram Kumar was convicted under Sections 302/149, 307/149 and 323 I.P.C. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. Pala was convicted under Sections 302/149, 307/149 and 323 I.P.C. He was also sentenced to imprisonment for life. This appeal by the appellants is under Section 19 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (prevention) Act, 1985.

2. According to the prosecution story Balraj along wit















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top