SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 946

N.P.SINGH, G.N.RAY, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Sanjay Dutt – Appellant
Versus
State Through C. B. I. , Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
BINA GUPTA, GOPAL JAIN, J.K.DAS, J.Savla, KAPIL SIBAL, KITTY KUMARAMANGALAM, KRISHAN MAHAJAN, LALIT BHASIN, MANMIT SINGH JAMVAL, N.NATRAJAN, NINA GUPTA, P.PARMESHVARAN, RASHMI KATHPALIA, V.K.AGARWAL, VINIT KUMAR,

ORDER

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. - Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21st September, 1994. We heard Sri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.

2. We are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. It is not necessary or advisable to say more than this at this stage. The petition is accordingly rejected.

3. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.

Petition dismissed.

For Citation : 1995 Crl. L.J. 477 = (1994) 5 SCC 410 = 1994 SCC (Crl.) 1433

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top