Back
1994 Supreme(SC) 946
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, G.N. Ray and N.P. Singh, JJ.
Sanjay Dutt – Petitioner
versus
State through C.B.I., Bombay - Respondent
Crl. Misc. Petition Nos. 3338 - 3339 of 1994
In
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 1834-1835 of 1994
All Decided on 23.9.1994
Counsel for the parties:`
For the Petitioner - Kapil Sibal, Advocate.
For the Respondent - Natarajan, Advocate.
BINA GUPTA, GOPAL JAIN, J.K.DAS, J.Savla, KAPIL SIBAL, KITTY KUMARAMANGALAM, KRISHAN MAHAJAN, LALIT BHASIN, MANMIT SINGH JAMVAL, N.NATRAJAN, NINA GUPTA, P.PARMESHVARAN, RASHMI KATHPALIA, V.K.AGARWAL, VINIT KUMAR,
Headnote:Bail - Bombay Blast Case - Bail petition pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994 - This Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture Petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial. (Paras 1 to 3)
ORDER
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. - Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21st September, 1994. We heard Sri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.
2. We are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. It is not necessary or advisable to say more than this at this stage. The petition is accordingly rejected.
3. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.
Petition dismissed.
For Citation : 1995 Crl. L.J. 477 = (1994) 5 SCC 410 = 1994 SCC (Crl.) 1433
