SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 299

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. Ratnavel Pandian. J.
Mool Chand - Petitioner
versus
The State through the Director, C.B.I. New Delhi. - Respondent
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 1917 of 1991
Decided on 4-7-1991
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent Additional Solicitor General of India

Advocates:
A.Subhashini, Altaf Ahmed, Gangdev, KAMINI JAISWAL, P.H.Parekh, RAM JETHMALANI

IMPORTANT POINT
Where investigation of crime registered u/ss. 3 & 4 of TADA and u/s. 8 of FERA required considerable time, release of petitioner on bail may frustrate the efforts of investigating agencies in collecting evidence. His bail application can be considered only on completion of investigation.

Headnote:Constitution of India - Art. 136 - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3 and 4 - Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1974 - Section 8 - Petitioner traced from statement of others, involving a terrorist for transfer of funds by way of haw ala transactions for them - F.I.R. lodged u/s. 3 & 4 of TADA and u/s. 8 of FERA - Petitioner arrested and on remand for investigation. SLP filed for release on bail - Whether bail be granted at the stage of investigation? (No) (Cross Ref: Constitution of India - Article 22 - Cr.P.C. 1973 - Section 50(1).

       Held: I bestowed my deep and anxious consideration to the submissions made by both the parties. As the matter is under investigation, I am not inclined to express any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case. Suffice to say that the investigation has to go a long way and hence sufficient time will be required for the investigating agencies to complete the investigations. Further, having regard to the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, as pointed out by the Designated Court, the release of the petitioner on bail at this crucial stage may frustrate the effort of the investigating agencies in collecting evidence. Hence his bail application is dismissed at this stage. However, the investigating agencies are directed to expedite and complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner is permitted to renew the application for bail after two months. (Para 6)

       Held further: The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly. (Para 7)

       

ORDER

Ratnavel Pandian, J. - This Special Leave Petition is directed against the Order of the Designated Court, Delhi dated 3-6-1991 rejecting the application for regular bail to Mool Chand Shah, the petitioner herein and in the alternative releasing him on interim bail.

2. The petitioner is an accused in FIR No. 53 of 1991 of Chandni Mahal Police Station, Delhi registered under Sections 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (T ADA) and under Section 8 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act (FERA). The prosecution is as follows:

3. The petitioner is an unauthorised dealer illegally dealing in foreign exchange-commonly known as Hawala transaction and he has been instrumental in transferring huge sums received from different sources to the members of militant outfits of Jammu and Kashmir for use in terrorist and disruptive activities. It is stated that on receipt of a secret information, a trap was laid by Delhi police on 25-3-1991 resulting in the apprehension of accused Ashfaq Hussain Lone from whom three incriminating letters, one addressed to Master Ahsan Dar, Commander-in-Chief of Hizbul Mujaheedin, a banned Terrorist Organisation of Kashmir Valley and another addressed to one Mashud containing information about making arrangements for a house in Srinagar and for recruiting people in the valley and the third one addressed to Firdaus containing secessionist messages, formation of militant groups etc. were seized. At the time of the apprehension, accused Ashfaq Hussain Lone shouted slogans, Pakistan Zindabad, Azad Kashmir Zindabad etc. The case FIR No. 53 of 1991, referred to above, was registered only after his arrest on 25-3-1991. In pursuance of his statement, 23 drafts for a sum of Rs. 15.50 lakhs and a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in cash were also recovered which amounts are stated to have been given to accused Ashfaq Hussain Lone by accused Shahbuddin Ghauri, a research student of JNU who in turn stated to have received the same from Dr. Ayub Thakur of U.K. through illegal means of Hawala Transaction. Accused Shahbuddin Ghauri was also arrested by Delhi Police on 27-3-1991 and on his pointing out, another accused Shambhu Dayal Sharma @ Guptaji who is stated to have delivered the sum of Rs. 16.27 1akhs, was also arrested on 1-4-1991. On the disclosure of accused Shambhu Dayal Sharma to the effect that the petitioner, Mool Chand Shah was the person through whom he started transactions at Delhi and passed on the money to different people including to accused Shahbuddin Ghauri which were recovered from Ashfaq Hussain Lone while being taken to Kashmir for terrorist activities, Delhi Police sent a requisition to Bombay on 134-1991 for apprehending petitioner/accused Mool Chand Shah who was accordingly arrested at Bombay on 164-1991 and was brought to Delhi on 234-1991 on a production warrant issued by the Court. The petitioner was kept in police custody on Courts order upto 10-5-1991 for interrogation and thereafter was sent to judicial custody upto 29-6-1991. (It is now stated at the bar that the remand of the petitioner is further extended.). The investigation of this case was taken over by the CBI on 20-4-1991. The CBI conducted simultaneous searches at 20 places including the places of sub-bankers of Hawala from where the accused persons used to collect the money for making payments to different persons and also at the places where the final deliveries were made. According to the prosecution, a huge amount of Rs. 93,52,755/- in cash and foreign exchange worth Rs. 3,69,307/-, Indira Vikas Patra worth Rs. 10,50,000/- and gold bars worth Rs. 12 lakhs were recovered and the investigation connecting the terrorist links of the places from where the money had been kept/delivered by the accused persons in this case is continuing not only in India but also in abroad and that the investigation is likely to take sufficient time to unearth the whole conspiracy behind the said heinous crime of funding









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top