SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1007

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Anand and M.K. Mukherjee, JJ.
Darshana Devi - Appellant
versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 681 of 1985
Decided on 11-10-1995
vv

Advocates:
A.D.N.Rao, N.D.GARG, R.S.Suri, RAJIV K.GARG, Ranbir Yadav, U.R.Lalit

Headnote:Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984-Section 14 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Conviction under. Appeal Death by burning. No eye witness - Deceased and appellant married 10 years prior to occurrence. Their only son died few weeks before. Deceased, husband died as a result of extensive burn injuries - Deceased being under influence of liquor when he received burn injuries - Oral dying declaration allegedly made to his mother and sister implicating wife - Variance in statements of two witnesses with regard to exact words allegedly used by deceased. Medical report stating deceased was not in a fit condition to make statement. No motive to commit murder of her husband. Reason to falsely implicate appellant - Failure to establish circumstances to connect appellant with crime.

       Conviction recorded not sustainable. (Paras 8, 10, 13 & 14)

       

JUDGMENT

A.S. Anand, J. - The appellant was tried for an offence under Section 302 IPC for the alleged murder of Madan Lal, her husband. The learned Judge of the Special Court, Ferozepur convicted her for the said offence and sentenced her to suffer imprisonment for life vide judgment dated 29.8.1985. Through this statutory appeal under Section 14 of the Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984, the appellant has called in question her conviction and sentence.

2. The prosecution story in short is that the appellant and deceased were married about 10 years prior to the date of occurrence. They were serving as Government teachers and posted at different places. The couple had a son who was suffering from blood cancer and unfortunately died on 23.7.1984. Though the summer vacations had finished on 22.7.1984, the couple had applied for extension of leave on account of the death of their son and the leave in the case of each one of them was extended upto 31.8.1984 the day of the occurrence. It is alleged that on the night intervening 30-31 August, 1984 at about 2.00 a.m. deceased Madan Lal knocked at the door of his mother, Lachhmi Devi, PW-l who was living separately alongwith one of the sisters of the deceased, Bimla Devi, PW-2 just across the lane. When PW -1 opened the door she found the deceased to be burning and on enquiry he told his mother and sister, PWs 1and 2, that the appellant had sprinkled kerosene oil on him and set, him on fire. Lachhmi Devi, PW-1 rushed him to the hospital where they reached about 2.30 a.m. Dr. Janak Lal Mittal PW-4 started treating him and sent information to the police through rukka Ex. P3. The deceased had suffered extensive bum injuries and was semi-conscious. Shri Rajinder Singh, SHO, Police Station PW-5 arrived at the hospital and made an enquiry from the doctor whether the deceased was in a fit condition to make a statement. The doctor replied in the negative. The SHO PW-5, thereafter, recorded the statement of Lachhmi Devi PW -1, Ex. P1, at about 4.30 a.m. and sent the same to the police station for registration of the case and that forms the basis of the formal FIR Ex. P1/B. It was initially registered under Section 307 IPC but after Madan Lal succumbed to the bum injuries at about 8.30 a.m. in the hospital, the offence was converted into one under Section 302 IPC. When the deceased was brought to the hospital by his wife Jitendar Lal, PW-3, a Municipal Commissioner was present at the hospital, as he had taken his elder brothers daughter Radha Rani and admitted her in the emergency ward of the hospital. PW-3 informed the investigating officer that he was lying in the verandah when he heard the deceased saying aloud that he had been burnt by his wife. His statement was recorded by the SHO.

3. During the course of investigation, SHO PW-5 visited the spot and prepared a rough site plan of the place of occurrence. He took into possession a broken bottle smelling of kerosene oil Ex. M/O/l from the house of the deceased under seizure memo Ex. P8. A match-box Ex. M/0/4 was also taken into possession from the room vide seizure memo Ex. P9. Some burnt portion of the shirt belonging to the deceased was collected from the lane and seized vide memo Ex. P10. The inquest report was prepared by the SHO PW-5 and the dead body was sent for post-mortem examination. The autopsy was performed by Dr. K.K. Singhla and it revealed death due to shock and haemorrhage on account of extensive burns. The viscera of the deceased besides pieces of liver, lung and spleen were preserved and sent for chemical examination. According to the report of chemical examiner, Ex. P12, there was presence of alcohol in the viscera and that the blood-alcohol concentration was 86.25 mg ml per 100 m/s. The report of the chemical examiner also revealed that alcohol was found present in the pieces of liver, spleen, kidney and lungs besides the pieces of stomach, small intestine and large intestines. After completion of the invest















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top