B.P.SINGH, ARUN KUMAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar – Respondent
Judgment
B.P. Singh, J.—The application for intervention is refused.
2. The State of U.P., the appellant herein has impugned the order passed by a learned Judge of the Allahabad High Court dated 20th September, 2002 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 4909 of 2002. The learned Judge, – by his aforesaid order, modified his earlier order passed on 21.5.2002 which was an order passed on an application filed by the respondent under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
3. The facts of the case are that the respondent Surendra Kumar is a partner of a firm which has been appointed as the City Booking Agent of the Northern Railways having its office in Kanpur. It appears that the Sales Tax Officer seized certain goods from the aforesaid city booking office of the respondent and in connection therewith a proceeding was initiated which was pending before the Court of the First ACJM, Kanpur. A criminal case was registered under Sections 420, 468, 471, 481, 482 and 120B I.P.C. but it is not in dispute that the respondent is not an accused in that case which is against unknown persons. A prayer was made before the learned ACJM for release of the goods seized by the Sales Tax authorities. After considering th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.