SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 180

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Nagesh Datta Shetti – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

Challenge in this appeal is the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court refusing to interfere with the order passed by learned Single Judge in view of the fact that the Ankola Taluk Land Tribunal (in short the ‘Tribunal’) had disposed of the matter pursuant to the direction given by learned Single Judge.

2. The appellants had filed the writ appeal before the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court aggrieved primarily by that part of the order of learned Single Judge who had remanded the matter to the Tribunal, with a specific direction to grant occupancy rights in favour of the respondents, who were the petitioners in the writ petition. This appeal was admitted but there was no order of stay passed in the appeal either directing stay of further proceedings before the Tribunal or staying operation of the order of learned Single Judge, as no application had been filed for grant of any interim relief. In the absence of any order of stay, pursuant to the directions given by learned Single Judge the proceedings came to be heard by the Tribunal which hold that the respondents were to be granted occupancy rights in line with the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top