SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 189

S.N.VARIAVA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.H.KAPADIA
O. K. Play (India) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi-III, Gurgaon – Respondent


Judgment

Kapadia, J.—The short question which arises for determination in these Civil Appeals filed by the assessee and by the department, respectively, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is - whether the assessee was right in classifying the following articles under Chapter Heading 95.03 and clearing the same without payment of duty. The said ­articles are Activity Desks and Chairs, Fun Fliers, Play Table, Play Pool, Rockers, Slides and Swings.

2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of toys. On 24th April, 1987, a team of officers from Anti Evasion Branch of the Delhi Commissionerate visited the factory premises of the assessee situate at Gurgaon, Haryana, when they found that the assessee was manufacturing the above articles with the help of machines and which were being cleared without payment of duty.

3. On 4th November, 1997, a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee alleging mis-declaration in the classification list by prefixing and suffixing each of the above items with the words “baby” and “toys” respectively. Consequently, “Activity Desks and Chairs” were described as “Baby Chair Toy” and “Baby Desk Toy”; Rockers were described as “Baby Rocker




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top