SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 306

B.P.SINGH, S.B.SINHA, N.S.HEGDE
Laxmi Sales Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Bolangir Trading Co. – Respondent


Judgment

Santosh Hegde, J.—Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

2. These two appeals arise out of the civil Writ Petition No. 3592 of 2003 filed before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. One ­appeal arises out of an order dated 22.8.2003 made by the High Court in the main writ petition (C) No. 3592/03). The connected appeal arises out of an order made on 22.12.2003 by the High Court in Review Petition No. 127 of 2003.

3. Writ Petition (C) No. 3592 of 2003 was filed by the contesting respondent herein viz. respondent No. 3. In the said writ petition the said respondent sought for an order quashing the tender process held for Bolangir - Bhawanipatna territory whereby the second respondent herein had rejected the tender of the said respondent herein for providing pre-paid telephone services in the district of Bolangir - Bhawanipatna. It was the contention of the said respondent before the High Court that though it was fully qualified to be considered and awarded the above said contract, the same was rejected on erroneous grounds by the second respondent herein and the contract was awarded in favour of the appellant.

4. The High Court while entertaining the said writ petition allowed the same a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top