SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 314

ARUN KUMAR, B.P.SINGH
Kishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

B.P. Singh, J.—Heard counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal by special leave has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dated 23rd June, 1999 passed in writ petition No. 2604/99. By the aforesaid judgment and order the High Court dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellant and affirmed the orders passed by the authorities under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 holding that the appeal preferred by the appellant before the Commissioner Jabalpur Division being an appeal under Section 33 of the aforesaid Act was barred by time.

3. It is submitted before us that the Parliament enacted the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (Act No. 45/99) which received the assent of the President on 22nd March, 1999 but which is deemed to have come into force in the States of Haryana and Punjab and in all the Union territories on the 11th day of January, 1999 and in any other State which adopts this Act under clause (2) of Article 252 of the Constitution of India on the date of such adoption. It is the further submission of counsel for the appellant on the basis of the notificati








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top